Literature DB >> 22391575

Prospective association between body mass index and receipt of preventive services: results from the Central Pennsylvania Women's Health Study (CePAWHS).

Jennifer L Kraschnewski1, Jennifer S McCall-Hosenfeld, Carol S Weisman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examine whether overweight and obesity are associated with disparities in clinical preventive services receipt in a unique, prospective, population-based cohort of reproductive-age women.
METHOD: We used data from the Central Pennsylvania Women's Health Study (CePAWHS) longitudinal survey of women ages 18-45. The baseline random-digit-dial telephone survey was conducted in 2004-2005 and a second telephone interview two years later; 1342 participants comprised the analytic sample. Dependent variables were seven preventive services identified at follow-up. In addition to baseline body mass index (BMI) category, independent variables were selected based on the behavioral model of health services utilization.
RESULTS: Forty-six percent of the sample was classified as normal weight, 28% as overweight, and 26% as obese. In adjusted analyses, women who were overweight and obese, compared to women with normal weight, were more likely to receive preventive counseling for diet/nutrition, physical activity, and weight management (p<0.01). Overweight and obese women received more cholesterol and diabetes screening (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). However, there were no differences by BMI category in receipt of Pap testing or reproductive counseling.
CONCLUSION: Overall, we found that women with overweight and obesity were more likely to receive preventive services, especially services relevant for overweight and obese populations.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22391575      PMCID: PMC3345091          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  18 in total

1.  Preventive care in relation to obesity: an analysis of a large, national survey.

Authors:  Alyson J Littman; Thomas D Koepsell; Christopher W Forsberg; Edward J Boyko; William S Yancy
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Validity of self-reported height and weight in women of reproductive age.

Authors:  Larissa R Brunner Huber
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-10-26

3.  Quality of care among obese patients.

Authors:  Virginia W Chang; David A Asch; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Obesity and receipt of clinical preventive services in veterans.

Authors:  William S Yancy; Jennifer R McDuffie; Karen M Stechuchak; Maren K Olsen; Eugene Z Oddone; Linda S Kinsinger; Santanu K Datta; Deborah A Fisher; Katrina M Krause; Truls Østbye
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Preconceptional health: risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes by reproductive life stage in the Central Pennsylvania Women's Health Study (CePAWHS).

Authors:  Carol S Weisman; Marianne M Hillemeier; Gary A Chase; Anne-Marie Dyer; Sara A Baker; Mark Feinberg; Danielle Symons Downs; Roxanne L Parrott; Heather K Cecil; John J Botti; Colin MacNeill; Cynthia H Chuang; Berwood Yost
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

6.  Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care--United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care.

Authors:  Kay Johnson; Samuel F Posner; Janis Biermann; José F Cordero; Hani K Atrash; Christopher S Parker; Sheree Boulet; Michele G Curtis
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2006-04-21

7.  Cause-specific excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity.

Authors:  Katherine M Flegal; Barry I Graubard; David F Williamson; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Outcomes of maternal weight gain.

Authors:  Meera Viswanathan; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Merry K Moos; Andrea Deierlein; Sunni Mumford; Julie Knaack; Patricia Thieda; Linda J Lux; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2008-05

9.  Preconception predictors of birth outcomes: prospective findings from the central Pennsylvania women's health study.

Authors:  Carol S Weisman; Dawn P Misra; Marianne M Hillemeier; Danielle Symons Downs; Cynthia H Chuang; Fabian T Camacho; Anne-Marie Dyer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2009-05-27

10.  Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparing Resident Self-Report to Chart Audits for Quality Improvement Projects: Accurate Reflection or Cherry-Picking?

Authors:  Ethan F Kuperman; Kristen Tobin; Jennifer L Kraschnewski
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-12

Review 2.  Importance of engaging obstetrician/gynecologists in cardiovascular disease prevention.

Authors:  Deborah B Ehrenthal; Janet M Catov
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  In a safety net population HPV4 vaccine adherence worsens as BMI increases.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Britney M Else; Mitchell J Bartley; Anne M Arey; Angela L Barnett; Beth E Rosemergey; Christopher A Paynter; Inge Verdenius; Sean M Harper; George D Harris; Jennifer A Groner; Gerard J Malnar; Jeffrey Wall; Aaron J Bonham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.