Literature DB >> 22391463

Collaborative evaluation of a high school prevention curriculum: How methods of collaborative evaluation enhanced a randomized control trial to inform program improvement.

Muhsin Michael Orsini1, David L Wyrick, Jeffrey J Milroy.   

Abstract

Blending high-quality and rigorous research with pure evaluation practice can often be best accomplished through thoughtful collaboration. The evaluation of a high school drug prevention program (All Stars Senior) is an example of how perceived competing purposes and methodologies can coexist to investigate formative and summative outcome variables that can be used for program improvement. Throughout this project there were many examples of client learning from evaluator and evaluator learning from client. This article presents convincing evidence that collaborative evaluation can improve the design, implementation, and findings of the randomized control trial. Throughout this paper, we discuss many examples of good science, good evaluation, and other practical benefits of practicing collaborative evaluation. Ultimately, the authors created the term pre-formative evaluation to describe the period prior to data collection and before program implementation, when collaborative evaluation can inform program improvement.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22391463      PMCID: PMC3433286          DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  1 in total

1.  What Works for Promoting Health at School: Improving Programs against the Substance Abuse.

Authors:  Elena Faccio; Antonio Iudici; Francesca Turco; Matteo Mazzucato; Gianluca Castelnuovo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.