Literature DB >> 22390909

Cardiovascular risk in relation to functionality of sequence variants in the gene coding for the low-density lipoprotein receptor: a study among 29,365 individuals tested for 64 specific low-density lipoprotein-receptor sequence variants.

Roeland Huijgen1, Iris Kindt, Joep C Defesche, John J P Kastelein.   

Abstract

AIMS: A plethora of mutations in the LDL-receptor gene (LDLR) underlie the clinical phenotype of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). For the diagnosis of FH, it is important, however, to discriminate between pathogenic and non-pathogenic mutations. The aim of the current study was to assess whether true pathogenic mutations were indeed associated with the occurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD) when compared with non-functional variants. The latter variants should not exhibit such an association with CAD. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We assessed 29 365 individuals tested the 64 most prevalent LDLR variants. First, we determined pathogenicity for each of these sequence variants. Subsequently, a Cox-proportional hazard model was used to compare event-free survival, defined as the period from birth until the first CAD event, between carriers and non-carriers of LDLR mutations. Fifty-four sequence variants in the LDLR gene were labelled as pathogenic and 10 as non-pathogenic. The 9 912 carriers of a pathogenic LDLR mutation had a shorter event-free survival than the 18 393 relatives who did not carry that mutation; hazard ratio 3.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.24-4.08; P< 0.001]. In contrast, the 355 carriers of a non-pathogenic LDLR variant had similar event-free survival as the 705 non-carrying relatives; hazard ratio 1.00 (95% CI: 0.52-1.94; P= 0.999).
CONCLUSION: These findings with respect to clinical outcomes substantiate our criteria for functionality of LDLR sequence variants. They also confirm the CAD risk associated with FH and underline that these criteria can be used to decide whether a specific sequence variant should be used in cascade screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22390909     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  16 in total

Review 1.  Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Rodrigo Alonso; Leopoldo Perez de Isla; Ovidio Muñiz-Grijalvo; Jose Luis Diaz-Diaz; Pedro Mata
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2018-08

Review 2.  Current Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  Cameron T Lambert; Pratik Sandesara; Ijeoma Isiadinso; Maria Carolina Gongora; Danny Eapen; Neal Bhatia; Jefferson T Baer; Laurence Sperling
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2014-12

Review 3.  Family health history: underused for actionable risk assessment.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ginsburg; R Ryanne Wu; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9-resistant R410S Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Mutation: A NOVEL MECHANISM CAUSING FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA.

Authors:  Delia Susan-Resiga; Emmanuelle Girard; Robert Scott Kiss; Rachid Essalmani; Josée Hamelin; Marie-Claude Asselin; Zuhier Awan; Chutikarn Butkinaree; Alexandre Fleury; Armand Soldera; Yves L Dory; Alexis Baass; Nabil G Seidah
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Personalized genomic disease risk of volunteers.

Authors:  Manuel L Gonzalez-Garay; Amy L McGuire; Stacey Pereira; C Thomas Caskey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The importance of an integrated analysis of clinical, molecular, and functional data for the genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Asier Benito-Vicente; Ana Catarina Alves; Aitor Etxebarria; Ana Medeiros Medeiros; Cesar Martin; Mafalda Bourbon
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Refinement of variant selection for the LDL cholesterol genetic risk score in the diagnosis of the polygenic form of clinical familial hypercholesterolemia and replication in samples from 6 countries.

Authors:  Marta Futema; Sonia Shah; Jackie A Cooper; KaWah Li; Ros A Whittall; Mahtab Sharifi; Olivia Goldberg; Euridiki Drogari; Vasiliki Mollaki; Albert Wiegman; Joep Defesche; Maria N D'Agostino; Antonietta D'Angelo; Paolo Rubba; Giuliana Fortunato; Małgorzata Waluś-Miarka; Robert A Hegele; Mary Aderayo Bamimore; Ronen Durst; Eran Leitersdorf; Monique T Mulder; Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep; Eric J G Sijbrands; John C Whittaker; Philippa J Talmud; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 8.  Towards Increasing the Clinical Relevance of In Silico Methods to Predict Pathogenic Missense Variants.

Authors:  David L Masica; Rachel Karchin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 9.  New Approaches in Detection and Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Merel L Hartgers; Kausik K Ray; G Kees Hovingh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Quality assessment of the genetic test for familial hypercholesterolemia in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Iris Kindt; Roeland Huijgen; Marieke Boekel; Kristiaan J van der Gaag; Joep C Defesche; John J P Kastelein; Peter de Knijff
Journal:  Cholesterol       Date:  2013-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.