Literature DB >> 22390189

Further evidence of validity of the Modified Melbourne Assessment for neurologically impaired children aged 2 to 4 years.

Melinda Randall1, Christine Imms, Leeanne Carey.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper reports the second phase of a study to extend the Melbourne Assessment for use with children with neurological impairment aged 2 to 4 years. The aim was to establish if (1) children's scores on the Modified Melbourne Assessment (MMA) and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) showed a moderate to high, positive relation, (2) children had comparable behaviours for task and time demands on both tools, and (3) scores on the MMA could discriminate between children with mild, moderate, and severe levels of upper limb impairment.
METHOD: An observational study of 30 children (19 males, 11 females) with neurological impairment aged 2 to 4 years. Twenty-four children had spasticity (20 with a unilateral and four with a bilateral impairment) and two children presented with athetosis, two with ataxia, and two with hypotonia.
RESULTS: A high, positive relation was found between children's scores on the MMA and the QUEST (ρ=0.90; p=0.001). The clinical use of the MMA was comparable to the QUEST. MMA scores were able to discriminate between children's levels of upper limb impairment as determined by clinicians' ratings (F(2,27) =67.76, p=0.001).
INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest the MMA can be clinically useful for children as young as 2.5 years and has the advantage of being valid for use with older children. Scores from the tool can also provide therapists with a quantitative means of consistently reporting level of upper limb impairment.
© 2012 The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology © 2012 Mac Keith Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22390189     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04252.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol        ISSN: 0012-1622            Impact factor:   5.449


  5 in total

1.  Using accelerometry for measurement of motor behavior in children: Relationship of real-world movement to standardized evaluation.

Authors:  Catherine R Hoyt; Shelby K Brown; Sarah K Sherman; Melanie Wood-Smith; Andrew N Van; Mario Ortega; Annie L Nguyen; Catherine E Lang; Bradley L Schlaggar; Nico U F Dosenbach
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-11-26

2.  COMBIT: protocol of a randomised comparison trial of COMbined modified constraint induced movement therapy and bimanual intensive training with distributed model of standard upper limb rehabilitation in children with congenital hemiplegia.

Authors:  Roslyn N Boyd; Jenny Ziviani; Leanne Sakzewski; Laura Miller; Joanne Bowden; Ross Cunnington; Robert Ware; Andrea Guzzetta; Richard Al Macdonell; Graeme D Jackson; David F Abbott; Stephen Rose
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.474

3.  Constraint-induced movement therapy in children with unilateral cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Brian J Hoare; Margaret A Wallen; Megan N Thorley; Michelle L Jackman; Leeanne M Carey; Christine Imms
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-01

4.  Safety and effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on hand function in preschool children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A pilot study.

Authors:  Wenjie He; Yuan Huang; Lu He; Liru Liu; Peishan Zeng; Huiying Qiu; Xiaoyue Wang; Hongyu Zhou; Zhaofang Chen; Yi Xu; Jingyi Zhao; Wenda Wang; Hongmei Tang; Kaishou Xu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Test-retest reliability of upper limb robotic exoskeleton assessments in children and youths with brain lesions.

Authors:  Laura Prospero; Monica Liesch; Judith V Graser; Urs Keller; Hubertus J A van Hedel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.