Literature DB >> 22390186

Outcome of in vitro fertilization following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in downregulated women of advanced reproductive age: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial.

Hong Ye1, Guoning Huang, Li Pei, Pinghong Zeng, Xiu Luo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) on ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in downregulated women of advanced reproductive age.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized and controlled study of 127 consecutive normogonadotropic infertile women ≥ 35 years old undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles received ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG (n = 63) or with rFSH (n = 64) in a long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol.
RESULTS: More leading (≥ 18 mm) follicles and oocytes were obtained in rFSH group (p = 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively). The proportion of top-quality embryo from oocyte retrieval and live birth rate per started cycle trended towards improvement with HP-hMG (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8; OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.9-3.9; respectively), although they were not significant difference between two groups. At end of stimulation, higher serum progesterone level was found in rFSH group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Following downregulated women of advanced reproductive age, superiority of HP-hMG over rFSH in live birth rate could not be concluded from this study, but noninferiority was established. Pharmacodynamic differences in follicular development, oocyte/embryo quality and endocrine response exist between HP-hMG and rFSH, which may be relevant to treatment outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22390186     DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2011.650742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  10 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes following long GnRHa ovarian stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin plus rFSH or rFSH in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Li Shu; Qianhua Xu; Qingxia Meng; Xue Dai; Yun Zhang; Wei Zhou; Honggang Yi; Jinyong Liu; Chunxiang Wu; Zhen Hou; Yugui Cui; Tin Chiu Li; Jiayin Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-04

Review 2.  Required amount of rFSH, HP-hMG and HP-FSH to reach a live birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E M Bordewijk; F Mol; F van der Veen; M Van Wely
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2019-06-01

3.  Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany.

Authors:  Klaus F Bühler; Robert Fischer; Patrice Verpillat; Arthur Allignol; Sandra Guedes; Emmanuelle Boutmy; Wilma Bilger; Emilia Richter; Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Economic evaluation of highly purified human menotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian stimulation in high-responder patients: analysis of the Menopur in Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist Single Embryo Transfer-High Responder (MEGASET-HR) trial.

Authors:  Jared C Robins; Andrew F Khair; Eric A Widra; Michael M Alper; Winnie W Nelson; Eric D Foster; Anshul Sinha; Masakazu Ando; Patrick W Heiser; Gaurang S Daftary
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 5.  Human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) compared to urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: a literature review and cost evaluation.

Authors:  P E Levi Setti; C Alviggi; G L Colombo; C Pisanelli; C Ripellino; S Longobardi; P L Canonico; G De Placido
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Economic evaluation of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm-injection cycles in Sweden.

Authors:  Jaro Wex; Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-08-09

7.  The effect of human chorionic gonadotrophin contained in human menopausal gonadotropin on the clinical outcomes during progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Xiuxian Zhu; Jing Ye; Yonglun Fu; Ai Ai; Renfei Cai; Yun Wang; Qingging Hong; Tian Hui; Qifeng Lyu; Qiuju Chen; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-24

8.  Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Authors:  Linli Hu; Songying Zhang; Song Quan; Jieqiang Lv; Weiping Qian; Yuanhua Huang; Weiying Lu; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.682

9.  Gonadotropin versus Follicle-Stimulating Hormone for Ovarian Response in Patients Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison.

Authors:  Zhisong Ji; Xiaozhen Quan; Yanli Lan; Meng Zhao; Xiaolong Tian; Xuezhou Yang
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2019-12-02

Review 10.  Interplay Between mTOR and Hippo Signaling in the Ovary: Clinical Choice Guidance Between Different Gonadotropin Preparations for Better IVF.

Authors:  Kyriaki Papageorgiou; Eirini Mastora; Athanasios Zikopoulos; Maria E Grigoriou; Ioannis Georgiou; Theologos M Michaelidis
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.555

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.