Literature DB >> 22388473

What's it worth? Public willingness to pay to avoid mental illnesses compared with general medical illnesses.

Dylan M Smith1, Laura J Damschroder, Scott Y H Kim, Peter A Ubel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Allocation of resources for the treatment of mental illness is low relative to the burden imposed by these illnesses. The reason for this discrepancy has not been established. Few studies have directly and systematically compared public evaluations of the importance of treating mental illnesses and general medical illnesses. This study assessed public willingness to pay for treatments of mental health conditions and of general medical conditions to determine whether willingness to pay less for mental health treatments is due to the perception that mental health conditions are less burdensome.
METHODS: U.S. adults (N=710) in a nationally representative sample were provided with descriptions of two mental and three general medical illnesses. Respondents rated their willingness to pay to avoid each illness and then their perception of the burdensomeness of each illness.
RESULTS: Participants rated the two mental illnesses as relatively more burdensome than the general medical illnesses, but the amount they were willing to pay to avoid the mental illnesses was lower. Specifically, participants were willing to pay 40% less to avoid the mental illnesses compared with the general medical conditions, for a comparable benefit in terms of quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Even though respondents recognized that severe mental illnesses can dramatically lower quality of life, they were less willing to pay to avoid such illnesses than they were to pay to cure less burdensome general medical illnesses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22388473     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201000036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  7 in total

1.  What is behavioral health worth?

Authors:  Pamela S Hyde; Kana Enomoto
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Effect of the Exclusion of Behavioral Health from Health Information Technology (HIT) Legislation on the Future of Integrated Health Care.

Authors:  Deborah Cohen
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Coping strategies and distress reduction in psychological well-being? A structural equation modelling analysis using a national population sample.

Authors:  X Meng; C D'Arcy
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 6.892

4.  Attitudes About Required Coverage of Mental Health Care in a U.S. National Sample.

Authors:  Donovan T Maust; Michelle H Moniz; Kara Zivin; Helen C Kales; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Yvette Edelaar-Peeters; Matthijs M Versteegh; Elly A Stolk
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07

6.  Audience segmentation to disseminate behavioral health evidence to legislators: an empirical clustering analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Félice Lê-Scherban; Xi Wang; Paul T Shattuck; Enola K Proctor; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Is prevention of suicide worth less? A comparison of the value per statistical life.

Authors:  Vimefall Elin; Persson Mattias; Olofsson Sara; Hultkrantz Lars
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-08-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.