Literature DB >> 22387620

Neural bases of falsification in conditional proposition testing: evidence from an fMRI study.

Jimei Liu1, Meng Zhang, Jerwen Jou, Xin Wu, Wei Li, Jiang Qiu.   

Abstract

The ability of testing the validity of a conditional statement is important in our everyday life. However, the brain mechanisms underlying this process, especially falsification process which is important in daily life, but especially crucial to scientific reasoning and research is not as yet completely clear. Therefore, in the present study, we used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the neural bases of the falsification process in testing the validity of a conditional statement as used in Wason's (1966) selection task. Our fMRI results showed that: (1) compared with the baseline condition, both Falsification (by using Modus Ponens, and Modus Tollens) and Non-Falsification conditions (affirming the consequent, and denying the antecedent) activated the left frontal areas (BA44/45, or BA6), and basal ganglia, the areas previously found in the rule-guided conditional reasoning operations; the parietal area (BA40, BA7) for recruiting cognitive resources to represent and maintain the different evidential information in working memory. (2) The left middle frontal gyrus (BA9) and cerebellum were shown to be activated in the contrast of Falsification condition versus Non-Falsification condition and in the contrast of MT versus Non-Falsification condition. These results indicated that the left middle frontal gyrus (BA9) might be the key brain region involved in the falsification process of conditional statement for which abstracting and integrating logical relationships, and inhibiting the distraction of the irrelevant information were the essential processes. Moreover, the cerebellum was found to be responsible for constructing an internal working model. In addition, our brain imaging results might support the dual-process theory of reasoning.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22387620     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  6 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of frontal cortex decreases performance on the WAIS-IV intelligence test.

Authors:  Kristin K Sellers; Juliann M Mellin; Caroline M Lustenberger; Michael R Boyle; Won Hee Lee; Angel V Peterchev; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  At the core of reasoning: Dissociating deductive and non-deductive load.

Authors:  John P Coetzee; Martin M Monti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Working memory circuit as a function of increasing age in healthy adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julia Andre; Marco Picchioni; Ruibin Zhang; Timothea Toulopoulou
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.881

4.  Set-shifting and inhibition interplay affect the rule-matching bias occurrence during conditional reasoning task.

Authors:  Seyyedeh Fatemeh Seyyed Hashemi; Reza Khosrowabadi; Mohsen Karimi
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-06

5.  Neural Correlates of Causal Inferences in Discourse Understanding and Logical Problem-Solving: A Meta-Analysis Study.

Authors:  Wangshu Feng; Weijuan Wang; Jia Liu; Zhen Wang; Lingyun Tian; Lin Fan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Deductive-reasoning brain networks: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of the neural signatures in deductive reasoning.

Authors:  Li Wang; Meng Zhang; Feng Zou; Xin Wu; Yufeng Wang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.708

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.