Literature DB >> 22386959

Effect of coronary bypass and valve structure on outcome in isolated valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

William Clifford Roberts1, Carey Camille Roberts, Travis James Vowels, Jong Mi Ko, Giovanni Filardo, Baron Lloyd Hamman, Gregory John Matter, Albert Carl Henry, Robert Frederick Hebeler.   

Abstract

Reports differ regarding the effect of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients who undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS), and no reports have described the effect of aortic valve structure in patients who undergo AVR for AS. A total of 871 patients aged 24 to 94 years (mean 70) whose AVR for AS was their first cardiac operation, with or without first concomitant CABG, were included. Patients who underwent mitral valve procedures were excluded. In comparison with the 443 patients (51%) who did not undergo CABG, the 428 (49%) who underwent concomitant CABG were significantly older, were more often male, had lower transvalvular peak systolic pressure gradients and larger valve areas, had lower frequencies of congenitally malformed aortic valves, had lighter valves by weight, had higher frequencies of systemic hypertension, and had longer stays in the hospital after AVR. Early and late (to 10 years) mortality were similar by propensity-adjusted analysis in patients who did and did not undergo concomitant CABG. Congenitally unicuspid or bicuspid valves occurred in approximately 90% of those aged 21 to 50, in nearly 70% in those aged 51 to 70 years, and in just over 30% in those aged 71 to 95 years. Unadjusted and adjusted survival was significantly higher in patients with unicuspid or bicuspid valves compared to those with tricuspid valves. In conclusion, although concomitant CABG had no effect on the adjusted probability of survival, the type of aortic valve (unicuspid or bicuspid vs tricuspid) significantly affected the unadjusted and adjusted probability of survival.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386959     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Unicuspid aortic valve presenting with cardiac arrest in an adolescent.

Authors:  Tara Connelly; Walenty Kolcow; Yvonne Smyth; David Veerasingham
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Coronary artery disease and outcomes of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Jocelyn M Beach; Tomislav Mihaljevic; Lars G Svensson; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Thomas Marwick; Brian Griffin; Douglas R Johnston; Joseph F Sabik; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Operative treatment of combined aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nedzad Kadric; Emir Kabil; Emir Mujanovic; Mehdin Hadziselimovic; Mirza Jahic; Stojan Rajkovic; Enes Osmanovic; Sevleta Avdic; Suad Keranovic; Adnan Behrem
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2015-02-21

Review 4.  Contemporary Revascularization Dilemmas in Older Adults.

Authors:  Sonali Kumar; Michael McDaniel; Habib Samady; Farshad Forouzandeh
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.