Literature DB >> 22386923

Stage for stage comparison of recurrence patterns after definitive chemoradiotherapy or surgery for oesophageal carcinoma.

T D Reid1, I Ll Davies, J Mason, S A Roberts, T D L Crosby, W G Lewis.   

Abstract

AIMS: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has been advocated as an alternative treatment for oesophageal carcinoma, but received criticism for perceived poorer locoregional disease control when compared with surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the relative incidence and pattern of oesophageal carcinoma recurrence after dCRT and surgery in patients receiving stage-directed therapy with curative intent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 623 consecutive patients with oesophageal carcinoma (207 squamous cell carcinoma, 416 adenocarcinoma) were studied. The primary outcome measure was disease-free survival, adjusted for baseline differences in gender, age and histological cell type.
RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven patients deemed unsuitable for surgery on the grounds of performance status (n = 137), bulky local disease (n = 121) or personal choice (n = 53) received dCRT and 312 surgery (200 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy). Oesophageal carcinoma recurrence was diagnosed in 44.1% of patients after dCRT compared with 40.7% after surgery (P = 0.222). Locoregional recurrence was more common after dCRT than after surgery (24.1% versus 9.3%, P < 0.0001). In contrast, distant metastases were more common after surgery than after dCRT (22.8% versus 12.9%, P = 0.001). The median time to recurrence in patients receiving dCRT and surgery were 15 and 17 months, respectively (P = 0.052). Stage-related disease-free 2 year survival for dCRT versus surgery was: stage I (68.6 versus 85.6%, P = 0.069), stage II (36.9 versus 47.4%, P = 0.011), stage III (31.0 versus 28.6, P = 0.878), stage IVa (21.4 versus 26.3%, P = 0.710).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further support for a randomised trial of dCRT versus surgery in both oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.
Copyright © 2012 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386923     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  8 in total

1.  Influence of Neoadjuvant Radiation Dose on Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy and Survival in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Mickey S Ising; Katy Marino; Jaimin R Trivedi; Adam A Rojan; Neal E Dunlap; Victor van Berkel; Matthew P Fox
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Single centre outcomes from definitive chemo-radiotherapy and single modality radiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ben Alexander Fulton; Joanna Gray; Alexander McDonald; David McIntosh; Vivienne MacLaren; Aisling Hennessy; Derek Grose
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-04

3.  The impact of the nodal status on the overall survival of non-surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zongxing Zhao; Yanan Zhang; Peiliang Wang; Xin Wang; Minghuan Li
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Genetic variants of EGF and VEGF predict prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Pei-Wen Yang; Min-Shu Hsieh; Ya-Chuan Huang; Ching-Yueh Hsieh; Tzu-Hsuan Chiang; Jang-Ming Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Details of out-field regional recurrence after involved-field irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaoli Zhang; Jinming Yu; Minghuan Li; Hui Zhu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: dose, response and survival.

Authors:  Yijun Luo; Qingfeng Mao; Xiaoli Wang; Jinming Yu; Minghuan Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Impact of incremental circumferential resection margin distance on overall survival and recurrence in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  W R C Knight; J Zylstra; W Wulaningsih; M Van Hemelrijck; D Landau; N Maisey; A Gaya; C R Baker; J A Gossage; J Largergren; A R Davies
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-04-23

8.  Comparison of gross target volumes based on four-dimensional CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Huimin Li; Fengxiang Li; Jianbin Li; Youzhe Zhu; Yingjie Zhang; Yanluan Guo; Min Xu; Qian Shao; Xijun Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.