Literature DB >> 22386887

Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes.

Qianhong She1, Xue Jin, Qinghua Li, Chuyang Y Tang.   

Abstract

Osmotically driven membrane processes, such as forward osmosis (FO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO), are attracting increasing interest in research and applications in environment and energy related fields. In this study, we systematically investigated the alginate fouling on an osmotic membrane during FO operation using four types of draw solutions (NaCl, MgCl(2), CaCl(2) and Ca(NO(3))(2)) to elucidate the relationships between reverse (from draw solution to feed solution) and forward (from feed solution to draw solution) solute diffusion, and membrane fouling. At the same water flux level (achieved by adjusting the draw solution concentration), the greatest reverse solute diffusion rate was observed for NaCl draw solution, followed by Ca(NO(3))(2) draw solution, and then CaCl(2) draw solution and MgCl(2) draw solution, the order of which was consistent with that of their solute permeability coefficients. Moreover, the reverse solute diffusion of draw solute (especially divalent cation) can change the feed solution chemistry and thus enhance membrane fouling by alginate, the extent of which is related to the rate of the reverse draw solute diffusion and its ability to interact with the foulant. The extent of fouling for the four types of draw solution followed an order of Ca(NO(3))(2) > CaCl(2) >> MgCl(2) > NaCl. On the other hand, the rate of forward diffusion of feed solute (e.g., Na(+)) was in turn promoted under severe membrane fouling in active layer facing draw solution orientation, which may be attributed to the fouling enhanced concentration polarization (pore clogging enhanced ICP and cake enhanced concentration polarization). The enhanced concentration polarization can lead to additional water flux reduction and is an important mechanism governing the water flux behavior during FO membrane fouling. Findings have significant implications for the draw solution selection and membrane fouling control in osmotically driven membrane processes. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386887     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

1.  Gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) Scaling on Polybenzimidazole and Cellulose Acetate Hollow Fiber Membranes under Forward Osmosis.

Authors:  Si Cong Chen; Jincai Su; Feng-Jiang Fu; Baoxia Mi; Tai-Shung Chung
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-08

2.  Nanoparticle fouling and its combination with organic fouling during forward osmosis process for silver nanoparticles removal from simulated wastewater.

Authors:  Yanxiao Zhao; Xinhua Wang; Zhiwei Wang; Xiufen Li; Yueping Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  A Short Review of Membrane Fouling in Forward Osmosis Processes.

Authors:  Youngpil Chun; Dennis Mulcahy; Linda Zou; In S Kim
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-12

Review 4.  Challenges in Commercializing Biomimetic Membranes.

Authors:  Mark Perry; Steen Ulrik Madsen; Tine Jørgensen; Sylvie Braekevelt; Karsten Lauritzen; Claus Hélix-Nielsen
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 5.  Efficiently Combining Water Reuse and Desalination through Forward Osmosis-Reverse Osmosis (FO-RO) Hybrids: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Gaetan Blandin; Arne R D Verliefde; Joaquim Comas; Ignasi Rodriguez-Roda; Pierre Le-Clech
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.