Literature DB >> 2238667

Evaluation of effectiveness of mass screening for colorectal cancer.

M Fujita1, R Sugiyama, Y Kumanishi, J Ota, T Horino, Y Nakano, T Taguchi.   

Abstract

As the first step in the epidemiological evaluation of the effectiveness of mass screening for colorectal cancer, we compared clinicopathological features and survival rates of patients with cancer detected by mass screening (screened group) with those for patients treated in our outpatient clinic in the same period (outpatient group). The screened group consisted of 53 patients with colorectal cancer detected by 2-day or 3-day screening for fecal occult blood by guaiac slides. Their background factors were comparable to those of 120 patients of the outpatient group in regard to age, sex ratio, location of cancer, and histological type of cancer. In the screened group, 90% of patients had no complaints, and positive occult blood tests led to the detection of cancers. More than 60% of the patients had Dukes' A and B1 early cancers while only about 30% had advanced cancers. In the outpatient group, nearly 90% of patients were symptomatic, most commonly from rectal bleeding. Early-stage cancers made up only 20%, and large, advanced-stage cancers accounted for 80%. The 5-year survival rate of the screened group was 91.5%, being significantly higher than the 60% survival rate for the outpatient group. It is anticipated that mass screening for colorectal cancer by guaiac fecal occult blood testing will significantly reduce the mortality due to this neoplasm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2238667     DOI: 10.1007/bf01658816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  10 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  V B ASTLER; F A COLLER
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Evaluation of a mass screening program for stomach cancer with a case-control study design.

Authors:  A Oshima; N Hirata; T Ubukata; K Umeda; I Fujimoto
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1986-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Colonoscopic detection of early colorectal cancers. Impact of a surgical endoscopy service.

Authors:  W E Longo; G H Ballantyne; I M Modlin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Sensitivity of guaiac-impregnated cards for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  M L Crowley; L D Freeman; M D Mottet; R M Strong; B F Sweeney; R A Brower; S P Sharma; D S Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Mass screening for gastric cancer by X-ray examination.

Authors:  S Hisamichi; N Sugawara
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Mass screening for colorectal cancer by testing for occult blood under restricted diet and a questionnaire in Osaka.

Authors:  M Fujita; Y Nakano; J Ohta; Y Kumanishi; T Taguchi
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1987

7.  Screening for colorectal cancer: an overview.

Authors:  S J Winawer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Mass screening for colorectal cancer by testing fecal occult blood.

Authors:  M Fujita; Y Nakano; J Ohta; T Taguchi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Sensitivity of hemoccult testing in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  S D Wexner; G W Brabbee; W A Wichern
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Occult blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: a critical review.

Authors:  J B Simon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 22.682

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  General surgery.

Authors:  I Taylor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Occurrence and clinical significance of overt blood loss per rectum in the general population and in medical practice.

Authors:  G H Fijten; G H Blijham; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations.

Authors:  Maartje Nielsen; Frederik J Hes; Hans F A Vasen; Wilbert B van den Hout
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.103

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.