Literature DB >> 22386605

Revision total knee arthroplasty: infection should be ruled out in all cases.

Mohammad R Rasouli1, Armin Aalami Harandi, Bahar Adeli, James J Purtill, Javad Parvizi.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that some aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty failures are indeed caused by occult infection. This prospective study recruited 65 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty. The mean follow-up period was 19 months. Collected synovial fluid was analyzed by Ibis T5000 biosensor (Abbott Molecular Inc, Ill; a multiplex polymerase chain reaction technology). Cases were considered as infected or aseptic based on the surgeon's judgment and Ibis findings. Based on Ibis biosensor, 17 aseptic cases were indeed infected that had been missed. Of these 17 cases, 2 developed infection after the index revision. A considerable number of so-called aseptic failures seem to be occult infections that were not adequately investigated and/or miscategorized as aseptic failure. We recommend that all patients undergoing revision arthroplasty be investigated for periprosthetic joint infection.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386605     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Swab cultures are not as effective as tissue cultures for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Vinay K Aggarwal; Carlos Higuera; Gregory Deirmengian; Javad Parvizi; Matthew S Austin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Microbiological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections].

Authors:  T Holzmann; W Schneider-Brachert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Prevalence, interpretation, and management of unexpected positive cultures in revision TKA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Johannes Kloos; Koen Vander Linden; Stijn Vermote; Pieter Berger; Hilde Vandenneucker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Is sonication superior to dithiothreitol in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsikopoulos; Savas Ilias Christofilos; Dimitrios Kitridis; Konstantinos Sidiropoulos; Panagiotis N Stoikos; Christoforos Gravalidis; Panagiotis Givissis; Paraskevi Papaioannidou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 5.  [The Berlin diagnostic algorithm for painful knee TKA].

Authors:  K Thiele; J Fussi; C Perka; T Pfitzner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Detection of Bacteria Bearing Resistant Biofilm Forms, by Using the Universal and Specific PCR is Still Unhelpful in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Authors:  Batool H Zegaer; Anastasios Ioannidis; George C Babis; Vassiliki Ioannidou; Athanassios Kossyvakis; Sotiris Bersimis; Joseph Papaparaskevas; Efthimia Petinaki; Paraskevi Pliatsika; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 7.  A review of current practices in periprosthetic joint infection debridement and revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Humza M Mian; Joseph G Lyons; Joshua Perrin; Andrew W Froehle; Anil B Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-09-01

8.  Periprosthetic joint infection: Current concept.

Authors:  Vinay K Aggarwal; Mohammad R Rasouli; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 9.  The expanding horizon of prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Mayar Al Mohajer; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  J Appl Biomater Funct Mater       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.604

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.