Literature DB >> 22386538

Patient decision aids in knee replacement surgery.

Chethan Jayadev1, Tanvir Khan, Angela Coulter, David J Beard, Andrew J Price.   

Abstract

Arthroplasty is an effective intervention for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis refractory to conservative therapy. However, recent data highlights regional variations in service provision unrelated to disease severity and a low, but not insignificant, rate of patient dissatisfaction. The variation in knee arthroplasty provision is in part also due to the clinical decision-making of orthopaedic surgeons. The management of osteoarthritis is an example of a preference-sensitive clinical pathway, and possible explanations for poor patient satisfaction include unrealistic expectations and poor perception of potential benefits and risks. In addition to the individual impact, this represents an inefficient use of resources by healthcare providers during a challenging economic period. Improved shared-decision making between patients and clinicians would potentially address these issues. Patient decision aids provide relevant personalized evidence-based information to facilitate the shared decision-making process. Orthopaedic surgeons are receptive to the use of patient decision aids to support shared decision-making, but there are a number of issues to overcome before they are routinely adopted. The number of decision aids and the literature supporting their effectiveness is growing rapidly. NHS Direct has launched online patient decision support for knee osteoarthritis. The use of patient decision aids in clinical practice is gathering pace and may soon become the ethical and legal standard. This article provides a narrative review of patient decision aids in the context of knee replacement surgery from a UK perspective.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386538     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  11 in total

1.  Synovial fluid fingerprinting in end-stage knee osteoarthritis: a novel biomarker concept.

Authors:  Chethan Jayadev; Philippa Hulley; Catherine Swales; Sarah Snelling; Gary Collins; Peter Taylor; Andrew Price
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.853

2.  Medical services and associated costs vary widely among surgeons treating patients with hand osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Stéphanie J E Becker; Teun Teunis; Johann Blauth; Joost T P Kortlever; George S M Dyer; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Reducing gender disparities in post-total knee arthroplasty expectations through a decision aid.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Volkmann; John D FitzGerald
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  You'll know when you're ready: a qualitative study exploring how patients decide when the time is right for joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Deborah A Marshall; Gillian A Hawker; Eric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; Cy Frank; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Barriers and facilitators to orthopaedic surgeons' uptake of decision aids for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Samantha Bunzli; Elizabeth Nelson; Anthony Scott; Simon French; Peter Choong; Michelle Dowsey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Patient Decision Aid vs Educational Material on Decision Quality, Shared Decision-Making, Patient Experience, and Functional Outcomes in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Prakash Jayakumar; Meredith G Moore; Kenneth A Furlough; Lauren M Uhler; John P Andrawis; Karl M Koenig; Nazan Aksan; Paul J Rathouz; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

7.  Patients' decision making in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  T Barlow; D Griffin; D Barlow; A Realpe
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  How outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Timothy Barlow; Patricia Scott; Damian Griffin; Alba Realpe
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  The employment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to communicate the likely benefits of surgery.

Authors:  Norman Briffa
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2018-08-16

10.  Sources of information used by patients prior to elective surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Alvin Atlas; Steve Milanese; Karen Grimmer; Sarah Barras; Jacqueline H Stephens
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.