Literature DB >> 22386429

An in vivo evaluation of a novel spiral cut flexible ureteral stent.

Phillip Mucksavage1, Donald Pick, Dana Haydel, Mohammed Etafy, David C Kerbl, Jason Y Lee, Cervando Ortiz-Vanderdys, Fatma Saleh, Stephania Olamendi, Michael K Louie, Elspeth M McDougall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The flow characteristics, ureteral conformance, and histopathologic changes of a novel spiral cut flexible ureteral stent (Percuflex Helical, Boston Scientific, Boston, MA) were evaluated in vivo in an acute and chronic porcine model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flow characteristics and ureteral conformance of the novel stent were determined in 6 acute and 6 chronic swine models and compared with a control ureteral stent (Percuflex Plus, Boston Scientific). The flow characteristics were determined in vivo after ligating the renal vessels and via a nephrostomy tube delivering a standard rate of 0.9% saline at 35 cm H(2)O. Flows in the unobstructed ureter, normal stent, intraluminally obstructed stent, extraluminal obstructed stent, and both intraluminally and extraluminally obstructed conditions were determined. In the chronic animals, flow was determined at day 10, with the stent in place and immediately after stent removal. Conformance and hydronephrosis was assessed on pyelograms. Histopathologic changes were also evaluated in the chronic animals.
RESULTS: The acute and chronic flow characteristics in the novel stent were equivalent to the control stent. Size and weight of the kidney, degree of hydronephrosis, stent migration, and presence of urinary tract infection were also similar between the test and control stents. There were no differences seen in histopathologic grading or degree of encrustation in either stent. The novel stent appeared to conform better to the shape of the ureter in both acute and chronic animals.
CONCLUSION: The novel helical stent appears to drain as well as a standard stent and causes no increased degree of histopathologic changes in the ureter. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386429     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

Review 1.  Silicone vs. Polyurethane Stent: The Final Countdown.

Authors:  Suresh Mathias; Oliver Wiseman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Advances in ureteral stents.

Authors:  Hilary Brotherhood; Dirk Lange; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-09

Review 3.  Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials.

Authors:  Ali Mosayyebi; Costantino Manes; Dario Carugo; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Engineering solutions to ureteral stents: material, coating and design.

Authors:  Ali Mosayyebi; Aravinthan Vijayakumar; Qi Y Yue; Ewa Bres-Niewada; Costantino Manes; Dario Carugo; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-08-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.