Literature DB >> 22386359

The difference in myocardial injuries and mitochondrial damages between asphyxial and ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrests.

Min-Shan Tsai1, Chien-Hua Huang, Shang-Ho Tsai, Chia-Ying Tsai, Huei-Wen Chen, Hsaio-Ju Cheng, Chiung-Yuan Hsu, Tzung-Dau Wang, Wei-Tien Chang, Wen-Jone Chen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) and asphyxia account for most cardiac arrests but differ in cardiac arrest course, neurologic deficit, and myocardial damage. In VF resuscitation, cardiac mitochondria were known to be damaged via excess generation of reactive oxygen species. This study evaluated the difference of cardiac mitochondrial damages between VF and asphyxial cardiac arrests.
METHODS: In the VF + electrical shock (ES) group, VF was induced and untreated for 5 minutes, followed by 1 minute of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and 1 ES of 5 J. Animals were killed immediately after ES. In the asphyxia group, cardiac arrest was induced by airway obstruction, and then pulselessness was maintained for 5 minutes, followed by 1 minute of CPR. The animals were killed immediately after CPR. The histology and ultrastructural changes of myocardium and complex activities and respiration of mitochondria were evaluated. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening was measured based on mitochondrial swelling rate.
RESULTS: The histopathologic examinations showed myocardial necrosis and mitochondrial damage in both cardiac arrests. Instead of regional damages of myocardium in the VF + ES group, the myocardial injury in the asphyxia group distributed diffusely. The asphyxia group demonstrated more severe mitochondrial damage than the VF + ES group, which had a faster mitochondrial swelling rate, more decreased cytochrome c oxidase activity, and more impaired respiration.
CONCLUSIONS: Both VF and asphyxial cardiac arrests caused myocardial injuries and mitochondrial damages. Asphyxial cardiac arrest presented more diffuse myocardial injuries and more severe mitochondrial damages than VF cardiac arrest.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386359     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  5 in total

1.  Phenotyping Cardiac Arrest: Bench and Bedside Characterization of Brain and Heart Injury Based on Etiology.

Authors:  Thomas Uray; Andrew Lamade; Jonathan Elmer; Tomas Drabek; Jason P Stezoski; Amalea Missé; Keri Janesko-Feldman; Robert H Garman; Niel Chen; Patrick M Kochanek; Cameron Dezfulian; Clifton W Callaway; Ankur A Doshi; Adam Frisch; Francis X Guyette; Josh C Reynolds; Jon C Rittenberger
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Electrical storm: mechanistic and therapeutic considerations to avoid death in the survivors.

Authors:  Yukiomi Tsuji; Dobromir Dobrev
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Risk factor analyses for the return of spontaneous circulation in the asphyxiation cardiac arrest porcine model.

Authors:  Cai-Jun Wu; Zhi-Jun Guo; Chun-Sheng Li; Yi Zhang; Jun Yang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Comparison of Cerebral Metabolism between Pig Ventricular Fibrillation and Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest Models.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Chun-Sheng Li; Cai-Jun Wu; Jun Yang; Chen-Chen Hang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Impaired cerebral mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation function in a rat model of ventricular fibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Xiangshao Fang; Yue Fu; Wen Xu; Longyuan Jiang; Zitong Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.