Literature DB >> 22386227

Usefulness of cardiac biomarkers to predict cardiac recovery in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for refractory cardiogenic shock.

Charles-Edouard Luyt1, Antoine Landivier, Pascal Leprince, Maguy Bernard, Alain Pavie, Jean Chastre, Alain Combes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No prognostic markers of myocardial recovery in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock requiring circulatory support are known, but early identification of patients who will not recover might provide an opportunity to change the treatment strategy to improve outcome. Because N-terminal fragment of the B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin Ic, midregional fragment of the proatrial natriuretic peptide, proadrenomedullin, and copeptin are prognostic markers in patients with cardiac failure, we hypothesized that, among patients with refractory cardiogenic shock of potentially reversible cause supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the kinetics of these markers might help identify patients who would recover.
METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, single-center study in a medical-surgical intensive care unit. Among 41 consecutive patients with refractory cardiogenic shock of potentially reversible cause receiving ECMO support, 18 recovered and were successfully weaned off the machine. Blood N-terminal fragment of the B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin Ic, midregional fragment of the proatrial natriuretic peptide, proadrenomedullin, and copeptin concentrations were determined on days 1, 3, and 7 post-ECMO.
RESULTS: Neither the absolute values of those biomarkers at days 1, 3, or 7 nor their kinetics during the first week differed between patients weaned or not. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (95% confidence interval) of the day 1-to-day 3 biomarker changes for predicting cardiac recovery were 0.54 (0.36-0.71), 0.61 (0.43-0.78), 0.61 (0.42-0.77), 0.56 (0.38-0.73), and 0.61 (0.43-0.78), respectively.
CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory cardiogenic shock of potentially reversible cause receiving ECMO support, early measurements of cardiac biomarkers are not useful for identifying those who would recover.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386227     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  24 in total

1.  How to wean a patient from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Nadia Aissaoui; Aly El-Banayosy; Alain Combes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac arrest/cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Anders Aneman; Peter Macdonald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Biomarkers to Predict Reverse Remodeling and Myocardial Recovery in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Shweta R Motiwala; Hanna K Gaggin
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-10

Review 4.  Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock due to myocarditis in adult patients.

Authors:  Matteo Pozzi; Carlo Banfi; Daniel Grinberg; Catherine Koffel; Karim Bendjelid; Jacques Robin; Raphaël Giraud; Jean François Obadia
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Weaning from veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation: which strategy to use?

Authors:  Sofia Ortuno; Clément Delmas; Jean-Luc Diehl; Clotilde Bailleul; Aymeric Lancelot; Mahassen Naili; Bernard Cholley; Romain Pirracchio; Nadia Aissaoui
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

6.  Early Blood Pressure Variables Associated With Improved Outcomes in VA-ECLS: The ELSO Registry Analysis.

Authors:  Aniket S Rali; Sagar Ranka; Amy Butcher; Zubair Shah; Joseph E Tonna; Marc M Anders; Marshal D Brinkley; Hasan Siddiqi; Lynn Punnoose; Mark Wigger; Suzanne B Sacks; Dawn Pedrotty; Henry Ooi; Matthew D Bacchetta; Jordan Hoffman; William McMaster; Keki Balsara; Ashish S Shah; Jonathan N Menachem; Kelly H Schlendorf; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Sandip K Zalawadiya
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 12.544

7.  Assessment of cardiac recovery in patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Ravi Vuthoori; Cassandra Heaney; Brian Lima; Alexis Knisel; Ed Miller; Kevin Kennedy; David Majure; Gerin Stevens; Karl Bocchieri; Hugh Cassiere; Harold Fernandez; Simon Maybaum
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-04-22

8.  The ENCOURAGE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Grégoire Muller; Erwan Flecher; Guillaume Lebreton; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Nicolas Bréchot; Matthieu Schmidt; Ciro Mastroianni; Jean Chastre; Pascal Leprince; Amedeo Anselmi; Alain Combes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Choosing wisely - when to mend a broken heart with ECMO?

Authors:  R Stephens; Eddy Fan
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Risk stratification in emergency patients by copeptin.

Authors:  Kasper Iversen; Jens P Gøtze; Morten Dalsgaard; Henrik Nielsen; Søren Boesgaard; Morten Bay; Vibeke Kirk; Olav W Nielsen; Lars Køber
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.