Literature DB >> 22386144

Comparing the embolic potential of open and closed cell stents during carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Rami O Tadros1, Constantinos T Spyris, Ageliki G Vouyouka, Christine Chung, Prakash Krishnan, Margaret W Arnold, Michael L Marin, Peter L Faries.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the effects of open (O) and closed (C) cell stents on the size and number of embolic particles generated during carotid artery stenting (CAS) and assess the impact on outcome.
METHODS: Embolic debris from carotid filters after CAS was analyzed using photomicroscopy and imaging software. Patient comorbidities, preoperative cerebrovascular symptoms, stent type, and outcomes (perioperative major adverse events) were examined.
RESULTS: Carotid filters from 173 consecutive CAS procedures (O, 125 and C, 48) were reviewed. The mean age was 70.9 ± 9.2 years; 58% were men. Mean stenosis was 88.2% ± 8.1%; 36.6% had neurological symptoms preprocedurally. There was no difference in preoperative symptoms between the two groups (O, 38.7% vs C, 31.3%; P = not significant [NS]). However, closed cell stent use was associated with higher degree of stenosis (O, 87.2% ± 8.0% vs C, 90.6% ± 7.8%; P = .01), an older age (O, 70.0 ± 8.6 years vs C, 73.4 ± 10.2 years; P = .03), and peripheral arterial disease (21.1% vs 43.5%; P = .01). A larger mean particle size was observed in patients treated with open cell stents compared to closed cell stents (O, 416.5 ± 335.7 μm vs C, 301.1 ± 251.3 μm; P = .03). There was no significant difference in the total number of particles (O, 13.8 ± 21.5 vs C, 17.6 ± 19.9; P = NS), periprocedural stroke (P = NS), and major adverse events between the two groups (P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Open cell stents are associated with a larger mean particle size compared to closed cell stents. No impact on procedural outcomes based on stent type was observed.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386144     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  6 in total

1.  Demographic and Technical Risk Factors of 30-Day Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, and/or Death in Standard- and High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting.

Authors:  Afshin Borhani Haghighi; Samaneh Yousefi; Ehsan Bahramali; Safoora Kokabi; Seyed Taghi Heydari; Abdolhamid Shariat; Alireza Nikseresht; Nahid Ashjazadeh; Sadegh Izadi; Peyman Petramfar; Maryam Poursadegh; Abbas Rahimi Jaberi; Sajjad Emami; Hamid Agheli; Reza Nemati; Ehsan Yaghoubi; Mohammad Hosein Abdi; Majid Panahandeh; Moslem Heydari; Anahid Safari; Marziyeh Basir; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Randal Edgell
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-07

2.  Evaluation and management of plaque protrusion or thrombus following carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Naoki Hashimura; Tatsushi Mutoh; Kazuya Matsuda; Keigo Matsumoto
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 3.  Carotid artery stenting: current and emerging options.

Authors:  Simon Morr; Ning Lin; Adnan H Siddiqui
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-10-20

Review 4.  Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Krzysztof Malinowski; Kenneth Rosenfield; Laura Capoccia; Francesco Speziale; Gianmarco de Donato; Carlo Setacci; Christian Wissgott; Pasqualino Sirignano; Lukasz Tekieli; Andrey Karpenko; Waclaw Kuczmik; Eugenio Stabile; David Christopher Metzger; Max Amor; Adnan H Siddiqui; Antonio Micari; Piotr Pieniążek; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Andrej Schmidt; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Comparison of short-term outcomes after carotid artery stenting according to different stent designs.

Authors:  Muslum Sahin; Göksel Açar; Birol Ozkan; Gökhan Alıcı; Mehmet Vefik Yazıcıoglu; Mustafa Bulut; Mehmet Emin Kalkan; Serdar Demir; Rezzan Deniz Acar; Bilal Boztosun
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.426

6.  A comparative analysis of transcranial Doppler parameters acquired during carotid stenting and semi-eversion carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Germano da Paz Olveira; Ana Terezinha Guillaumon; Sérgio Clementino Benvindo; Joana Mayra Teixeira Lima; Sérgio Ricardo Freire Barreto; Wagner Mauad Avelar; Fernando Cendes
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.