Literature DB >> 22385632

Increasing the accuracy of peanut allergy diagnosis by using Ara h 2.

Thanh D Dang1, Mimi Tang, Sharon Choo, Paul V Licciardi, Jennifer J Koplin, Pamela E Martin, Tina Tan, Lyle C Gurrin, Anne-Louise Ponsonby, Dean Tey, Marnie Robinson, Shyamali C Dharmage, Katrina J Allen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurement of whole peanut-specific IgE (sIgE) is often used to confirm sensitization but does not reliably predict allergy. Ara h 2 is the dominant peanut allergen detected in 90% to 100% of patients with peanut allergy and could help improve diagnosis.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether Ara h 2 testing might improve the accuracy of diagnosing peanut allergy and therefore circumvent the need for an oral food challenge (OFC).
METHODS: Infants from the population-based HealthNuts study underwent skin prick tests to determine peanut sensitization and subsequently underwent a peanut OFC to confirm allergy status. In a stratified random sample of 200 infants (100 with peanut allergy and 100 with peanut tolerance), whole peanut sIgE and Ara h 2 sIgE levels were quantified by using fluorescence enzyme immunoassay.
RESULTS: By using the previously published 95% positive predictive value of 15 kU(A)/L for whole peanut sIgE, a corresponding specificity of 98% (95% CI, 93% to 100%) was found in this study cohort. At the equivalent specificity of 98%, the sensitivity of Ara h 2 sIgE is 60% (95% CI, 50% to 70%), correctly identifying 60% of subjects with true peanut allergy compared with only 26% correctly identified by using whole peanut sIgE. We report that when using a combined approach of plasma sIgE testing for whole peanut followed by Ara h 2 for the diagnosis of peanut allergy, the number of OFCs required is reduced by almost two thirds.
CONCLUSION: Ara h 2 plasma sIgE test levels provide higher diagnostic accuracy than whole peanut plasma sIgE levels and could be considered a new diagnostic tool to distinguish peanut allergy from peanut tolerance, which might reduce the need for an OFC.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22385632     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.01.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  49 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing the diagnosis of food allergy.

Authors:  Jacob D Kattan; Scott H Sicherer
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Antigenic Liposomes for Generation of Disease-specific Antibodies.

Authors:  Kyle J Bednar; Lakeya Hardy; Johanna Smeekens; Dharmendra Raghuwanshi; Shiteng Duan; Mike D Kulis; Matthew S Macauley
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  Utility of Component-Resolved Diagnostics in Food Allergy.

Authors:  Karen S Tuano; Carla M Davis
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 4.  100 Years later: Celebrating the contributions of x-ray crystallography to allergy and clinical immunology.

Authors:  Anna Pomés; Maksymilian Chruszcz; Alla Gustchina; Wladek Minor; Geoffrey A Mueller; Lars C Pedersen; Alexander Wlodawer; Martin D Chapman
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 5.  Human Immune Monitoring Techniques during Food Allergen Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Blake J Rust; Erik Wambre
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.806

6.  Preparation and Analysis of Peanut Flour Used in Oral Immunotherapy Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jelena P Berglund; Nicole Szczepanski; Anusha Penumarti; Ayeshia Beavers; Janelle Kesselring; Kelly Orgel; Bruce Burnett; A Wesley Burks; Michael Kulis
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2017-01-26

7.  IgE testing can predict food allergy status in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Pamela A Frischmeyer-Guerrerio; Marjohn Rasooly; Wenjuan Gu; Samara Levin; Rekha D Jhamnani; Joshua D Milner; Kelly Stone; Anthony L Guerrerio; Joseph Jones; Magnus P Borres; Erica Brittain
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 6.347

8.  IgE, but not IgG4, antibodies to Ara h 2 distinguish peanut allergy from asymptomatic peanut sensitization.

Authors:  X Hong; D Caruso; R Kumar; R Liu; X Liu; G Wang; J A Pongracic; X Wang
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 13.146

9.  Early decrease in basophil sensitivity to Ara h 2 precedes sustained unresponsiveness after peanut oral immunotherapy.

Authors:  Sarita U Patil; Johanna Steinbrecher; Agustin Calatroni; Neal Smith; Alex Ma; Bert Ruiter; Yamini Virkud; Michael Schneider; Wayne G Shreffler
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 10.  Overview of component resolved diagnostics.

Authors:  Regina Treudler; Jan C Simon
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.