Literature DB >> 22385455

Review of medicolegal cases for cauda equina syndrome: what factors lead to an adverse outcome for the provider?

Eldra W Daniels1, Zachary Gordon, Keisha French, Uri M Ahn, Nicholas U Ahn.   

Abstract

Cauda equina syndrome is 1 of a few true surgical emergencies involving the lumbar spine. Although treatment within 48 hours has been found to correlate with improved outcomes, recovery of bowel and bladder control does not always occur, and loss of these functions can be distressing to patients. An understanding of factors affecting the legal outcome can aid the clinician in determining risk management for medicolegal cases of cauda equina syndrome. This study is a retrospective analysis of medicolegal cases involving cauda equina syndrome. The LexisNexis Academic legal search database was used to obtain medicolegal cases of cauda equina syndrome to determine risk factors for adverse decisions for the provider. Outcomes data on trial verdicts were collected, as were associated penalties. Case data were also compiled on age, sex, initial presentation site, initial diagnosis, whether a rectal examination was performed, time to consultation with a specialist, time to completion of advanced imaging study, time to surgery, and neurosurgical vs orthopedic consultation. Based on our study of court cases involving cauda equina syndrome, a positive association was found between time to surgery >48 hours and an adverse decision (P<.05). The actual degree of functional loss did not appear to affect the verdicts. Because 26.7% of the cases involved an initial presentation that included loss of bowel or bladder control, this study emphasizes the importance of cautioning all patients with spinal complaints of the potential risk for cauda equina syndrome. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22385455     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120222-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

1.  A nine-year review of medicolegal claims in neurosurgery.

Authors:  S Mukherjee; C Pringle; M Crocker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Cauda Equina Syndrome: Does Race Matter?

Authors:  Amit Jain; Emmanuel Menga; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-04-21

3.  Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting.

Authors:  Nisaharan Srikandarajah; Adam J Noble; Martin Wilby; Simon Clark; Paula R Williamson; Anthony Guy Marson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies.

Authors:  Nisaharan Srikandarajah; Adam Noble; Simon Clark; Martin Wilby; Brian J C Freeman; Michael G Fehlings; Paula R Williamson; Tony Marson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Review/Perspective: Operations for Cauda Equina Syndromes - "The Sooner the Better".

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-03-25

6.  Medical Malpractice Claims and Mitigation Strategies Following Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Keith L Jackson; Jacob Rumley; Matthew Griffith; Timothy R Linkous; Uzondu Agochukwu; John DeVine
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.