Literature DB >> 22385366

Immunological effects and tolerability of a new fast updosed immunologically enhanced subcutaneous immunotherapy formulation with optimized allergen/adjuvant ratio.

O Pfaar1, K Jung, H Wolf, E Decot, J Kleine-Tebbe, L Klimek, E Wüstenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) traditionally includes an updosing phase injecting increasing doses of allergen over a period of several weeks, followed by a maintenance phase. To establish shorter and more convenient updosing schedules, a fast updosed immunologically enhanced SCIT formulation has been developed by optimizing the allergen/adjuvant (aluminium hydroxide) ratio.
METHODS: In a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial, patients with grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis with/without asthma were treated with an immunologically enhanced SCIT formulation (AVANZ, ALK, Denmark). The trial included updosing with five injections (300, 600, 3000, 6000 and 15,000 SQ+) injected either in weekly interval (Group 1) or in 3-4 days interval (Group 2) followed by two maintenance injections (15,000 SQ+), approximately 10 weeks treatment. The immunological effects (primary endpoint) and tolerability (secondary endpoint) of the updosing schedules were evaluated.
RESULTS: Four hundred patients were treated (Group 1: 201, Group 2: 199). In both groups, an immunological response with statistically significant increases in levels of IgE-blocking factor, IgG(4) and IgE (P < 0.001), was induced from baseline to end of trial. Most frequently reported adverse events were local injection site reactions such as injection site swellings (Group 1: 30% of patients, Group 2: 41% of patients). Other frequently reported adverse events included systemic reactions (Group 1: 21% of patients, Group 2: 33% of patients), primarily mild to moderate allergic rhinitis and urticaria.
CONCLUSIONS: Fast updosed immunologically enhanced SCIT with an optimized allergen/adjuvant ratio induced significant immunological effects and had an acceptable safety profile. Clinical efficacy will be investigated in future clinical trials.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22385366     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02801.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  2 in total

1.  Negative clinical results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of two doses of immunologically enhanced, grass subcutaneous immunotherapy despite dose-dependent immunological response.

Authors:  Jörg Kleine-Tebbe; Mikkel Walmar; Klaus Bitsch-Jensen; Elke Decot; Oliver Pfaar; Dolores Hernández Fernández de Rojas; Fernando Rodriguez
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Tolerability of an Immunologically Enhanced Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Preparation in Patients Treated with Concomitant Allergy Immunotherapy: A Non-Interventional Observational Study.

Authors:  Rainer Reiber; Hendrik Wolf; Jörg Schnitker; Eike Wüstenberg
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2017-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.