Literature DB >> 22384864

Women's perceptions and experiences of group cognitive behaviour therapy and other group interventions for postnatal depression: a qualitative synthesis.

Alison Scope1, Andrew Booth, Paul Sutcliffe.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper is a report of a systematic review that aimed to synthesize qualitative evidence relating to women's perceptions and experiences of group cognitive behaviour therapy and other group interventions for postnatal depression.
BACKGROUND: Postnatal depression may occur in women following childbirth, resulting in a range of distressing symptoms such as sadness, fatigue, and feelings of inability to look after their baby. Women tend to prefer psychological interventions. However, access to individual psychological therapy is limited by cost, waiting times, and availability of therapists. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in 17 major psychological, medical, health-related and health economics electronic bibliographic databases.
DESIGN: A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted using thematic synthesis. REVIEW
METHODS: Databases were searched from 1966-January 2008. A total of 116 full papers were screened against the inclusion criteria. Included papers were quality assessed. The original review protocol was restricted to evidence on group cognitive behaviour therapy. However, due to the paucity of evidence, the inclusion criteria were broadened to include other group interventions. A thematic synthesis was undertaken of the data extracted from the included papers.
RESULTS: Six studies were included. Specific benefits were that treatment enabled women to develop better relationships with their baby and understand postnatal depression. Negative aspects of treatment included difficulties in applying cognitive behavioural techniques, and unfavourable social comparisons with other group members.
CONCLUSIONS: Women have contrasting perceptions and experiences of group treatment. This suggests that greater attention should be focused on identifying those most likely to benefit from these treatments in a group environment.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22384864     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05954.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  5 in total

1.  "I'm Not the Only One With Depression": Women's Perceptions of In-Person Group Formats of Depressive Symptom Interventions.

Authors:  Christine Aubry; Amy Rider; Sasha Russell; Sara Moyer; Patricia Anne Kinser
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar 01       Impact factor: 2.522

2.  Appraisal of systematic reviews on interventions for postpartum depression: systematic review.

Authors:  Ryan Chow; Eileen Huang; Allen Li; Sophie Li; Sarah Y Fu; Jin S Son; Warren G Foster
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 3.  A Review of the Involvement of Partners and Family Members in Psychosocial Interventions for Supporting Women at Risk of or Experiencing Perinatal Depression and Anxiety.

Authors:  Maria Noonan; Julie Jomeen; Owen Doody
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?

Authors:  Kath Wright; Su Golder; Kate Lewis-Light
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-26

Review 5.  Is group cognitive behaviour therapy for postnatal depression evidence-based practice? A systematic review.

Authors:  Alison Scope; Joanna Leaviss; Eva Kaltenthaler; Glenys Parry; Paul Sutcliffe; Mike Bradburn; Anna Cantrell
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.630

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.