Literature DB >> 22383372

Myocardial systolic and diastolic consequences of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction.

Daniel A Morris1, Amalia Vaz Pérez, Florian Blaschke, Hermann Eichstädt, Cemil Ozcelik, Wilhelm Haverkamp.   

Abstract

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony deteriorates the longitudinal systolic and diastolic function of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with heart failure with a normal LV ejection fraction (HFNEF). METHODS AND
RESULTS: In patients with HFNEF and in a control group consisting of asymptomatic patients with LV diastolic dysfunction [LVDD], matched by age, gender, and LV ejection fraction, we assessed the global longitudinal systolic (global strain), diastolic [global early-diastolic strain rate (SRe)], and synchronous (standard deviation of time-to-peak systolic strain) function of the LV by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography using a 18-segment LV model. A total of 325 patients were included (85 with HFNEF and 240 with asymptomatic LVDD). Patients with HFNEF had a significant impairment of the longitudinal systolic and diastolic function of the LV as compared with the control group. Concerning the pathophysiological mechanisms linked to these findings, we found that HFNEF patients with asynchronous LV contractions had significantly more impaired longitudinal systolic and diastolic LV function (global strain -14.76 ± 3.44%, global SRe 0.79 ± 0.24 s(-1)) than patients without asynchronous LV contractions (global strain -18.57 ± 3.10%, global SRe 1.06 ± 0.32 s(-1); all P < 0.0001). Accordingly, in HFNEF patients with LV mechanical dyssynchrony the rates of LV longitudinal systolic and diastolic dysfunction were 64 and 70%, respectively, whereas these rates were significantly lower (19.5 and 41.3%), respectively, in patients without asynchronous LV contractions. In addition, HFNEF patients with LV mechanical dyssynchrony presented higher LV filling pressures and worse NYHA functional class than those with normal LV contractions.
CONCLUSION: In patients with HFNEF, LV mechanical dyssynchrony is associated with an important impairment of the longitudinal systolic and diastolic function of the LV. Therefore, the restoration of asynchronous LV contractions could help to improve and/or correct both the systolic and the diastolic longitudinal dysfunction of the LV in HFNEF and thereby improve the symptomatology of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22383372     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jes042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  14 in total

1.  Mechanical Dyssynchrony: A Risk Factor but not a Target.

Authors:  Amil M Shah; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Interactions between myocardial sympathetic denervation and left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony: A CZT analysis.

Authors:  Alessia Gimelli; Riccardo Liga; Francesca Menichetti; Ezio Soldati; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Paolo Marzullo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Global cardiac alterations detected by speckle-tracking echocardiography in Fabry disease: left ventricular, right ventricular, and left atrial dysfunction are common and linked to worse symptomatic status.

Authors:  Daniel A Morris; Daniela Blaschke; Sima Canaan-Kühl; Alice Krebs; Gesine Knobloch; Thula C Walter; Wilhelm Haverkamp
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Structural and functional cardiac analyses using modern and sensitive myocardial techniques in adult Pompe disease.

Authors:  Daniel A Morris; Daniela Blaschke; Alice Krebs; Sima Canaan-Kühl; Ursula Plöckinger; Gesine Knobloch; Thula C Walter; York Kühnle; Leif-Hendrik Boldt; Elisabeth Kraigher-Krainer; Burkert Pieske; Wilhelm Haverkamp
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Therapeutic Approaches in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) in Children: Present and Future.

Authors:  Bibhuti B Das
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Determinants of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients submitted to myocardial perfusion imaging: A cardiac CZT study.

Authors:  Alessia Gimelli; Riccardo Liga; Assuero Giorgetti; Brunella Favilli; Emilio Maria Pasanisi; Paolo Marzullo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: chronic low-intensity interval exercise training preserves myocardial O2 balance and diastolic function.

Authors:  Kurt D Marshall; Brittany N Muller; Maike Krenz; Laurin M Hanft; Kerry S McDonald; Kevin C Dellsperger; Craig A Emter
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-10-25

8.  Age- and sex-based reference limits and clinical correlates of myocardial strain and synchrony: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Susan Cheng; Martin G Larson; Elizabeth L McCabe; Ewa Osypiuk; Birgitta T Lehman; Plamen Stanchev; Jayashri Aragam; Emelia J Benjamin; Scott D Solomon; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 7.792

9.  Left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Angela B S Santos; Elisabeth Kraigher-Krainer; Natalie Bello; Brian Claggett; Michael R Zile; Burkert Pieske; Adriaan A Voors; John J V McMurray; Milton Packer; Toni Bransford; Marty Lefkowitz; Amil M Shah; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction based on aging and comorbidities.

Authors:  Ying Lin; Shihui Fu; Yao Yao; Yulong Li; Yali Zhao; Leiming Luo
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.