Brian D Gonzalez1, Paul B Jacobsen. 1. Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Brian.Gonzalez@moffitt.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous research has shown that lung cancer patients are at an increased risk for depressive symptomatology; however, little is known about the factors contributing to depression in these patients. This study focused on the possible association between perceived stigma related to a lung cancer diagnosis and depressive symptomatology. It was hypothesized that greater perceived stigma would be related to greater depressive symptomatology and that perceived stigma would account for variance in depressive symptomatology above and beyond that accounted for by relevant clinical, demographic, and psychosocial variables. METHOD: A sample of 95 participants receiving chemotherapy for stage II-IV non-small cell lung cancer was recruited during routine outpatient chemotherapy visits. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and self-report measures assessing perceived stigma, depressive symptomatology, and other psychosocial variables. A medical chart review was conducted to assess clinical factors. RESULTS: As hypothesized, there was a positive association between perceived stigma and depressive symptomatology, r = 0.46, p<0.001. Perceived stigma also accounted for significant unique variance in depressive symptomatology above and beyond that accounted for by relevant demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors, β = 0.19, p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should aim to replicate and extend these findings in longitudinal studies and explore whether lung cancer patients' depressive symptomatology can be ameliorated by targeting perceived stigma.
OBJECTIVE: Previous research has shown that lung cancerpatients are at an increased risk for depressive symptomatology; however, little is known about the factors contributing to depression in these patients. This study focused on the possible association between perceived stigma related to a lung cancer diagnosis and depressive symptomatology. It was hypothesized that greater perceived stigma would be related to greater depressive symptomatology and that perceived stigma would account for variance in depressive symptomatology above and beyond that accounted for by relevant clinical, demographic, and psychosocial variables. METHOD: A sample of 95 participants receiving chemotherapy for stage II-IV non-small cell lung cancer was recruited during routine outpatient chemotherapy visits. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and self-report measures assessing perceived stigma, depressive symptomatology, and other psychosocial variables. A medical chart review was conducted to assess clinical factors. RESULTS: As hypothesized, there was a positive association between perceived stigma and depressive symptomatology, r = 0.46, p<0.001. Perceived stigma also accounted for significant unique variance in depressive symptomatology above and beyond that accounted for by relevant demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors, β = 0.19, p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should aim to replicate and extend these findings in longitudinal studies and explore whether lung cancerpatients' depressive symptomatology can be ameliorated by targeting perceived stigma.
Authors: Sean M Phelan; Joan M Griffin; George L Jackson; S Yousuf Zafar; Wendy Hellerstedt; Mandy Stahre; David Nelson; Leah L Zullig; Diana J Burgess; Michelle van Ryn Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Heidi A Hamann; Jamie S Ostroff; Emily G Marks; David E Gerber; Joan H Schiller; Simon J Craddock Lee Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio; Emily K Porensky; Matthew Minotti; Susan Brown; Janet Snapp; Robert M Taylor; Michael D Adolph; Sherman Everett; Kenneth Lowther; Kelly Callahan; Devita Streva; Vicki Heinke; Debra Leno; Courtney Flower; Anne McVey; Barbara Lee Andersen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Jill B Hamilton; Allison M Deal; Angelo D Moore; Nakia C Best; Kayoll V Galbraith; Hyman Muss Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Brian D Gonzalez; Heather S L Jim; Julie M Cessna; Brent J Small; Steven K Sutton; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 3.894