OBJECTIVES: This study aims (i) to compare depression frequency and self-reported depression treatment in Mexican-origin and white men; (ii) to examine ethnic differences in self-reported prior depression diagnosis and types of treatment; and (iii) to determine whether Mexican-origin men (both English and Spanish language preferring) are less likely than white men to report receiving depression treatment after controlling for potential confounders. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, observational study of Mexican-origin and white men (60 years old and over) presenting for primary care visits at six outpatient clinics in California's Central Valley. Clinical depression was assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), module for past-year major depression and questions for chronic depression. Past year, self-reported prior depression diagnosis and treatment (i.e., medication, psychotherapy, mental health referral) were assessed through a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The frequency of past-year clinical depression was similar for both ethnic groups, yet Mexican-origin men were significantly less likely than whites to report receiving a prior diagnosis of depression or prior depression treatment. Compared with whites, the odds of untreated depression in Mexican-origin men was 4.35 (95% CI 1.35-14.08) for those interviewed in English and 10.40 (95% CI 2.11-51.25) for those interviewed in Spanish. For both ethnic groups, the majority (i.e., approximately two-thirds) of men receiving depression treatment also met criteria for past-year clinical depression. CONCLUSIONS: Mexican-origin older men in primary care suffer from significant gaps in depression care (i.e., diagnosis and treatment) compared with whites. Delivering effective depression treatment (i.e., so that depression remits) remains elusive for both ethnic groups.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims (i) to compare depression frequency and self-reported depression treatment in Mexican-origin and white men; (ii) to examine ethnic differences in self-reported prior depression diagnosis and types of treatment; and (iii) to determine whether Mexican-origin men (both English and Spanish language preferring) are less likely than white men to report receiving depression treatment after controlling for potential confounders. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, observational study of Mexican-origin and white men (60 years old and over) presenting for primary care visits at six outpatient clinics in California's Central Valley. Clinical depression was assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), module for past-year major depression and questions for chronic depression. Past year, self-reported prior depression diagnosis and treatment (i.e., medication, psychotherapy, mental health referral) were assessed through a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The frequency of past-year clinical depression was similar for both ethnic groups, yet Mexican-origin men were significantly less likely than whites to report receiving a prior diagnosis of depression or prior depression treatment. Compared with whites, the odds of untreated depression in Mexican-origin men was 4.35 (95% CI 1.35-14.08) for those interviewed in English and 10.40 (95% CI 2.11-51.25) for those interviewed in Spanish. For both ethnic groups, the majority (i.e., approximately two-thirds) of men receiving depression treatment also met criteria for past-year clinical depression. CONCLUSIONS: Mexican-origin older men in primary care suffer from significant gaps in depression care (i.e., diagnosis and treatment) compared with whites. Delivering effective depression treatment (i.e., so that depression remits) remains elusive for both ethnic groups.
Authors: Jürgen Unützer; Wayne Katon; Christopher M Callahan; John W Williams; Enid Hunkeler; Linda Harpole; Marc Hoffing; Richard D Della Penna; Polly Hitchcock Noël; Elizabeth H B Lin; Patricia A Areán; Mark T Hegel; Lingqi Tang; Thomas R Belin; Sabine Oishi; Christopher Langston Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J Unützer; W Katon; J W Williams; C M Callahan; L Harpole; E M Hunkeler; M Hoffing; P Arean; M T Hegel; M Schoenbaum; S M Oishi; C A Langston Journal: Med Care Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Lisa A Cooper; Junius J Gonzales; Joseph J Gallo; Kathryn M Rost; Lisa S Meredith; Lisa V Rubenstein; Nae-Yuh Wang; Daniel E Ford Journal: Med Care Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Christopher M Callahan; Frederick W Unverzagt; Siu L Hui; Anthony J Perkins; Hugh C Hendrie Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Andrea M Letamendi; Catherine R Ayers; Joshua L Ruberg; Daniel B Singley; Jacqueline Wilson; Denise Chavira; Lawrence Palinkas; Julie Loebach Wetherell Journal: J Cross Cult Gerontol Date: 2013-12
Authors: Maria E Garcia; Ladson Hinton; Steven E Gregorich; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Celia Kaplan; Leah Karliner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jaclynn M Hawkins; Claudia Schwenzer; Hillary K Hecht; Lenette Jones; Daniel Velez-Ortiz; Jaewon Lee; Brian Ahmedani; Gretchen Piatt Journal: Health Educ Care Date: 2019-10-01