Literature DB >> 22383060

Correlation between anorectocele with the anterior anal canal and anorectal junction anatomy using echodefecography.

F S P Regadas1, R G Lima Barreto, S M Murad-Regadas, L Veras Rodrigues, L M Pereira Oliveira.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the relationship between the pathogenesis of anorectocele and the anatomy of the anal canal and anorectal junction using echodefecography.
METHODS: The study was conducted on a total of 100 women with obstructed defecation, mean age 46.6 years, who underwent echodefecography. Patients were classified based on rectocele status into group I, without rectocele (n = 32); group II, grade I rectocele (n = 11); group III, grade II (n = 27); and group IV, grade III (n = 30). We identified the layers of the anterior anorectal wall and measured anterior external sphincter length, posterior external sphincter and puborectalis length, gap between anterior external sphincter and anorectal junction, anorectal wall thickness in 3 locations: (1) proximal to anterior external anal sphincter; (2) anterior anorectal junction; (3) 1.0 cm proximal to anorectal junction.
RESULTS: The anterior part of the external anal sphincter was significantly longer in group I (18.91 ± 0.38 mm) than in group III (16.94 ± 0.45 mm) (p < 0.05), and the length in group I was similar to that in group II (18.56 ± 0.44 mm) (p = 0.6223). The gap was significantly shorter in group I (21.24 ± 0.97 mm) than in group III (25.04 ± 0.82 mm) and group IV (23.82 ± 0.80 mm) (p < 0.05). The length of the anterior part of the external anal sphincter as a percentage of the length of the posterior external anal sphincter together with the puborectalis muscle was a mean of 57.39 ± 2.13% in group I, 56.01 ± 1.581% in group II, 47.77 ± 1.48% in group III, and 50.45 ± 1.61% in group IV, with a significantly higher percentage in group I than in groups III (p = 0.0126) and IV (p = 0.0007). No significant differences were identified between any of the groups regarding anorectal wall thickness at any of the 3 selected locations (p > 0.05). The muscularis propria layer of the rectal wall was not identified in 2 patients in group I (6.25%), 3 patients in group II (11.11%), and 3 patients in group III (10.00%), and 6 in group IV (8.82%), with no significant differences among groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The pathogenesis of anorectocele may be associated with a shorter anterior part of the external anal sphincter and consequently a longer gap. © Springer-Verlag 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22383060     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0805-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  23 in total

1.  Vaginal fascia, a myth.

Authors:  E UHLENHUTH; G W NOLLEY
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy.

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Anal canal anatomy showed by three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  F Sergio P Regadas; Sthela M Murad-Regadas; Doryane M R Lima; Flavio R Silva; Rosilma G L Barreto; Marcellus H L P Souza; F Sergio P Regadas Filho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Rectovaginal fascia: An important structure in pelvic visceral surgery? About its development, structure, and function.

Authors:  Barbara Ludwikowski; Irene Oesch Hayward; Helga Fritsch
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Changes in anal anatomy following vaginal delivery revealed by anal endosonography.

Authors:  A Frudinger; S Halligan; C I Bartram; J A Spencer; M A Kamm
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-03

6.  Prospective multicenter trial comparing echodefecography with defecography in the assessment of anorectal dysfunction in patients with obstructed defecation.

Authors:  F Sergio P Regadas; Eric M Haas; Maher A Abbas; J Marcio Jorge; Angelita Habr-Gama; Dana Sands; Steven D Wexner; Ingrid Melo-Amaral; Carlos Sardiñas; Doryane M Lima; Univaldo E Sagae; Evaldo U Sagae; Sthela M Murad-Regadas
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients.

Authors:  F Agachan; T Chen; J Pfeifer; P Reissman; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Defecographic pelvic floor abnormalities in constipated patients: does mode of delivery matter?

Authors:  Sthela Murad-Regadas; Thais V Peterson; Rodrigo A Pinto; F Sergio P Regadas; Dana R Sands; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  A novel three-dimensional dynamic anorectal ultrasonography technique (echodefecography) to assess obstructed defecation, a comparison with defecography.

Authors:  Sthela M Murad-Regadas; F Sérgio P Regadas; Lusmar V Rodrigues; Flavio R Silva; Fabio A Soares; Rodrigo D Escalante
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The rectogenital septum: morphology, function, and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Felix Aigner; Andrew P Zbar; Barbara Ludwikowski; Alfons Kreczy; Peter Kovacs; Helga Fritsch
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  3 in total

1.  Rectocele plication: description of a novel surgical technique and review of clinical results.

Authors:  Etienne W Henn; Hennie S Cronje
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The influence of age on posterior pelvic floor dysfunction in women with obstructed defecation syndrome.

Authors:  S M Murad-Regadas; L V Rodrigues; D C Furtado; F S P Regadas; G Olivia da S Fernandes; F S P Regadas Filho; A C Gondim; R de Paula Joca da Silva
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Impact of TRREMS on symptoms of obstructed defecation due to rectocele: predictive factors and outcomes.

Authors:  F S P Regadas; S M Murad-Regadas; L V Rodrigues; F S P Regadas Filho; A S Vilarinho; D P Morano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.781

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.