Literature DB >> 22382884

Defining innovations of therapeutic interventions: a position paper by the Italian Society of Hospital Pharmacists.

Silvia Adami1, Susanna Ciampalini, Marisa Dell'Aera, Roberta Di Turi, Annalisa Ferrarese, Andrea Messori, Angelo Palozzo, Piera Polidori, Marilena Romero, Francesca Venturini.   

Abstract

Defining innovation in pharmacotherapy is complex because general definitions cannot be easily adapted to the specificity of different therapeutic areas. The Italian Society of Hospital Pharmacists has developed a position paper in which three criteria are used to recognise innovation to a new intervention: (1) clinical relevance of the trial's primary end-point; (2) evidence of superiority; (3) use of an adequate comparator in the controlled trial. Clinically relevant end-points should appear in predetermined lists by therapeutic area managed by our society; likewise, the third criterion must be documented by an authoritative therapeutic guideline recognised to be still valid. A preliminary attempt is presented to retrospectively apply these criteria, particularly the first one, to a series of 21 clinical trials; this initial experience has generated a first list of clinically relevant end-points. This approach of innovation assessment is proposed for application also in the field of medical devices.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22382884     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-012-9618-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  7 in total

1.  A more evidence based approach to the use of surrogate end points in policy making.

Authors:  Oriana Ciani; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-25

2.  An update on the first decade of the European centralized procedure: how many innovative drugs?

Authors:  Domenico Motola; Fabrizio De Ponti; Elisabetta Poluzzi; Nello Martini; Pasqualino Rossi; Maria Chiara Silvani; Alberto Vaccheri; Nicola Montanaro
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Making sense of noninferiority: a clinical and statistical perspective on its application to cardiovascular clinical trials.

Authors:  Sanjay Kaul; George A Diamond
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.194

4.  Availability of comparative trials for the assessment of new medicines in the European Union at the moment of market authorization.

Authors:  Johan C F van Luijn; Frank W J Gribnau; Hubert G M Leufkens
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Choice of comparator in active control trials of new drugs.

Authors:  Johan C F van Luijn; Arie C van Loenen; Frank W J Gribnau; Hubert G M Leufkens
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Surrogates under scrutiny: fallible correlations, fatal consequences.

Authors:  Ray Moynihan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-08-15

7.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Stuart J Connolly; Michael D Ezekowitz; Salim Yusuf; John Eikelboom; Jonas Oldgren; Amit Parekh; Janice Pogue; Paul A Reilly; Ellison Themeles; Jeanne Varrone; Susan Wang; Marco Alings; Denis Xavier; Jun Zhu; Rafael Diaz; Basil S Lewis; Harald Darius; Hans-Christoph Diener; Campbell D Joyner; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.