Literature DB >> 22382793

A randomized double-blind study comparing intradermal anesthetic tolerability, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of lidocaine, buffered lidocaine, and bacteriostatic normal saline for peripheral intravenous insertion.

Vivienne Ganter-Ritz1, Karen Gabel Speroni, Martin Atherton.   

Abstract

In this double-blind study, 256 surgical patients meeting eligibility criteria were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to 1 of the 3 intradermal injection groups prior to intravenous (IV) line insertion (Group 1=1% lidocaine, Group 2=1% buffered lidocaine, and Group 3=bacteriostatic normal saline with a benzyl alcohol preservative). The most tolerable solution, as measured by the average level of pain from an intradermal insertion, was buffered lidocaine (Group 2). The most efficacious, as measured by average level of pain at IV cannulation, were Groups 1 and 2. Group 3 was the most cost-effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22382793     DOI: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e31824241cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infus Nurs        ISSN: 1533-1458


  3 in total

1.  Padded Dressing with Lidocaine HCL for Reducing Pain during Intravenous Cannulation in Adult Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Fatma Ferda Kartufan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 2.  Bacteriostatic preserved saline for pain-free periocular injections: review.

Authors:  Samantha Vicki Hunt; Raman Malhotra
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 3.  First do no harm: pain relief for the peripheral venous cannulation of adults, a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary Bond; Louise Crathorne; Jaime Peters; Helen Coelho; Marcela Haasova; Chris Cooper; Quentin Milner; Vicki Shawyer; Christopher Hyde; Roy Powell
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.217

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.