Literature DB >> 22382209

Rate of postprocedural stroke and death in SAMMPRIS trial-eligible patients treated with intracranial angioplasty and/or stent placement in practice.

Farhan Siddiq1, Saqib A Chaudhry, Rakesh Khatri, Gustavo J Rodriguez, Ramachandra Tummala, M Fareed K Suri, Adnan I Qureshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The SAMMPRIS (Stenting vs Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis) trial, comparing aggressive medical vs stent treatment in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis, was halted after a 14% stroke and death rate was observed in the stent-treated group.
OBJECTIVE: To study the 30-day stroke and death rate in intracranial angioplasty- and stent-treated patients meeting SAMMPRIS trial eligibility criteria.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 96 patients treated with intracranial angioplasty and stent placement at 3 university-affiliated institutions was performed. Patients were divided into SAMMPRIS trial eligible and ineligible groups based on inclusion and exclusion criteria for the SAMMPRIS trial.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were determined to be SAMMPRIS eligible and 27 patients were ineligible. The SAMMPRIS-eligible group was divided into angioplasty- and stent-treated subgroups (30 and 39 patients, respectively). The overall 30-day postprocedure stroke and death rate was 7.2% in the SAMMPRIS-eligible group and 7.4% in the SAMMPRIS-ineligible group (P = .97). The 30-day postprocedure stroke and death rate was 3.3% in the SAMMPRIS-eligible, angioplasty-treated subgroup and 10.2% in the SAMMPRIS-eligible, stent-treated subgroup (P = .27).
CONCLUSION: The overall 30-day postprocedure stroke and death rate in our study was lower in both SAMMPRIS-eligible and -ineligible groups than the reported 14% stroke and death rate in the SAMMPRIS trial. We hypothesize that a more judicious use of primary angioplasty may be responsible for better postprocedure outcomes and should be considered an acceptable treatment in future trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22382209     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182518575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  4 in total

1.  A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty versus stent placement for symptomatic intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Saqib A Chaudhry; Farhan Siddiq; Shahram Majidi; Gustavo J Rodriguez; M Fareed K Suri
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2013-12

2.  Multicenter Prospective Trial of Stent Placement in Patients with Symptomatic High-Grade Intracranial Stenosis.

Authors:  P Gao; D Wang; Z Zhao; Y Cai; T Li; H Shi; W Wu; W He; L Yin; S Huang; F Zhu; L Jiao; X Ji; A I Qureshi; F Ling
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Factors Influencing the Outcome of Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis With Hemodynamic Impairment After Short and Long-Term Stent Placement.

Authors:  Wentao Gong; Xianjun Zhang; Zhen Meng; Feifei Liu; Guangwen Li; Juan Xiao; Peng Liu; Yujie Sun; Tonghui Liu; Hongxia Wang; Yong Zhang; Naidong Wang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Pre- and Post-Angioplasty Perfusion CT with Acetazolamide Challenge in Patients with Unilateral Cerebrovascular Stenotic Disease.

Authors:  Seung-Hoon You; Sung-Min Jo; Young-June Kim; Jong-Hyeog Lee; Kwang-Deog Jo; Woong-Sub Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-10-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.