Literature DB >> 223820

Laparoscopic diagnosis of suspected liver neoplasms. Value of prior liver scans.

C J Lightdale, S J Winawer, R C Kurtz, W H Knapper.   

Abstract

To study the efficacy of standard blood tests of liver function (LFTs) and technetium-99m liver scan followed by laparoscopy in the diagnosis of solid malignant tumors of the liver, 100 consecutive patients were evaluated who had these tests because of clinical suspicion of liver neoplasm. Malignant liver tumors were present in 65 of the 100 patients. Laparoscopy diagnosed 60 of the 65, and the neoplasms were documented pathologically by directed biopsy (92% sensitivity, 100% specificity). In 8 patients, hepatoma was diagnosed and staged for possible resection. A negative "blind" biopsy had been performed in 23 of the 60 patients with liver neoplasms diagnosed at laparoscopy. LFTs and liver scans together were good screening tests (95% sensitivity) but had low specificity (46%). Liver scans also provided information as to probable tumor location in the liver, guiding the insertion site for the laparoscope, and directing deep-needle biopsies if no surface lesions were seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 223820     DOI: 10.1007/bf01333702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  16 in total

1.  Analysis of liver scanning in a general hospital.

Authors:  Z H Oster; S M Larson; H W Strauss; H N Wagner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Peritoneoscopy in Hodgkin disease. Confirmation of results by laparotomy.

Authors:  M Coleman; C J Lightdale; V P Vinciguerra; T J Degnan; M Goldstein; T Horwitz; S J Winawer; R T Silver
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-12-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Peritoneoscopy and radioisotope scintiscanning of the liver in the detection of hepatic metastases.

Authors:  A L Hitzelberger; G W Parker; W D Durden; G S Johnston
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Comparison of the accuracy of liver scans and peritoneoscopy in benign and malignant primary and metastasic tumours of the liver. 222 confirmed cases examined by both methods simultaneously.

Authors:  R Sauer; H Fahrländer; R Fridrich
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Diagnosis of liver involvement by lymphoma: results in 96 consecutive peritoneoscopies.

Authors:  C M Bagley; L B Thomas; R E Johnson; P B Chretien; V T DeVita
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  One-second biopsy of the liver--problems of its clinical application.

Authors:  G Menghini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Rational use of liver biopsy in the diagnosis of hepatic cancer.

Authors:  H O Conn
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Diagnostic approach to hepatic malignant neoplasms.

Authors:  M Viamonte; E Schiff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  D F Ransohoff; A R Feinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Peritoneoscopy and guided biopsy in the diagnosis of intraabdominal disease.

Authors:  N P Trujillo
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparison study of computed tomography and laparoscopy in the staging of abdominal neoplasms.

Authors:  R A Barth; R B Jeffrey; A A Moss; M S Liberman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Is hepatic ultrasonography a valid alternative tool to liver biopsy? Report on 507 cases studied with both techniques.

Authors:  G Celle; V Savarino; A Picciotto; M R Magnolia; P Scalabrini; M Dodero
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.