Literature DB >> 22381995

Professional autonomy, collaboration with physicians, and moral distress among European intensive care nurses.

Elizabeth D E Papathanassoglou1, Maria N K Karanikola, Maria Kalafati, Margarita Giannakopoulou, Chrysoula Lemonidou, John W Albarran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discretionary autonomy is a key factor in enhanced patient outcomes and nurses' work satisfaction. Among nurses, insufficient autonomy can result in moral distress.
OBJECTIVES: To explore levels of autonomy among European critical care nurses and potential associations of autonomy with nurse-physician collaboration, moral distress, and nurses' characteristics.
METHODS: Descriptive correlational study of a convenience sample of 255 delegates attending a major European critical care conference in 2009. Respondents completed a self-administered questionnaire with validated scales for nurses' autonomy, nurse-physician collaboration, and moral distress.
RESULTS: The mean autonomy score (84.26; SD, 11.7; range, 18-108) and the mean composite (frequency and intensity) moral distress score (73.67; SD, 39.19; range, 0-336) were both moderate. The mean collaboration score was 47.85 (SD, 11.63; range, 7-70). Italian and Greek nurses reported significantly lower nurse-physician collaboration than did other nurses (P < .001). Greek and German nurses reported significantly higher moral distress (P < .001). Autonomy scores were associated with nurse-physician collaboration scores (P < .001) and with a higher frequency of moral distress (P = .04). Associations were noted between autonomy and work satisfaction (P = .001). Frequency of moral distress was associated inversely with collaboration (ρ = -0.339; P < .001) and autonomy (ρ = -0.210; P = .01) and positively with intention to quit (ρ = 0.257; P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of European intensive care nurses, lower autonomy was associated with increased frequency and intensity of moral distress and lower levels of nurse-physician collaboration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22381995     DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2012205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  24 in total

1.  [Clinical everyday ethics-support in handling moral distress? : Evaluation of an ethical decision-making model for interprofessional clinical teams].

Authors:  S Tanner; H Albisser Schleger; B Meyer-Zehnder; V Schnurrer; S Reiter-Theil; H Pargger
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Moral Distress Amongst American Physician Trainees Regarding Futile Treatments at the End of Life: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dzeng; Alessandra Colaianni; Martin Roland; David Levine; Michael P Kelly; Stephen Barclay; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Pediatric Ethics and Communication Excellence (PEACE) Rounds: Decreasing Moral Distress and Patient Length of Stay in the PICU.

Authors:  Lucia Wocial; Veda Ackerman; Brian Leland; Brian Benneyworth; Vinit Patel; Yan Tong; Mara Nitu
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-03

4.  ICU staffing feature phenotypes and their relationship with patients' outcomes: an unsupervised machine learning analysis.

Authors:  Fernando G Zampieri; Jorge I F Salluh; Luciano C P Azevedo; Jeremy M Kahn; Lucas P Damiani; Lunna P Borges; William N Viana; Roberto Costa; Thiago D Corrêa; Dieter E S Araya; Marcelo O Maia; Marcus A Ferez; Alexandre G R Carvalho; Marcos F Knibel; Ulisses O Melo; Marcelo S Santino; Thiago Lisboa; Eliana B Caser; Bruno A M P Besen; Fernando A Bozza; Derek C Angus; Marcio Soares
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Correlation of happiness and professional autonomy in Iranian nurses.

Authors:  Seyyedeh Roya Mousavi; Kourosh Amini; Farhad Ramezani-Badr; Mahin Roohani
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2019-12-04

6.  The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams.

Authors:  Deborah Seys; Svin Deneckere; Walter Sermeus; Eva Van Gerven; Massimiliano Panella; Luk Bruyneel; Timothy Mutsvari; Rafaela Camacho Bejarano; Seval Kul; Kris Vanhaecht
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Ethical diversity and the role of conscience in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Stephen J Genuis; Chris Lipp
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2013-12-12

8.  Prevalence and sociodemographic associations of common mental disorders in a nationally representative sample of the general population of Greece.

Authors:  Petros Skapinakis; Stefanos Bellos; Sotirios Koupidis; Ilias Grammatikopoulos; Pavlos N Theodorakis; Venetsanos Mavreas
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Understanding burnout and moral distress to build resilience: a qualitative study of an interprofessional intensive care unit team.

Authors:  Jennifer Hancock; Tobias Witter; Scott Comber; Patricia Daley; Kim Thompson; Stewart Candow; Gisele Follett; Walter Somers; Corry Collins; Janet White; Olga Kits
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 6.713

10.  Monitoring the impact of the DRG payment system on nursing service context factors in Swiss acute care hospitals: Study protocol.

Authors:  Rebecca Spirig; Elisabeth Spichiger; Jacqueline S Martin; Irena Anna Frei; Marianne Müller; Michael Kleinknecht
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.