BACKGROUND: Changes in DNA methylation may play an important role in the deleterious reproductive effects reported in association with exposure to environmental pollutants. In this pilot study, we identify candidate methylation changes associated with exposure to pollutants in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: Blood and urine were collected from women on the day of oocyte retrieval. Whole blood was analyzed for mercury and lead, and urine for cadmium using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Unconjugated bisphenol A (BPA) was analyzed in serum using high-performance liquid chromatography with Coularray detection. Participants were dichotomized as higher or lower exposure groups by median concentrations. Using the Illumina GoldenGate Methylation Cancer Panel I, DNA methylation in whole blood from 43 women was assessed at 1505 CpG sites for association with exposure levels of each pollutant. Candidate CpG sites were identified using a Diff Score >|13| (P< 0.05) and an absolute difference >10% which were confirmed using bisulfite pyrosequencing. RESULTS: Methylation of the GSTM1/5 promoter was increased for women with higher mercury exposure (P= 0.04); however, no correlation was observed (r= 0.17, P= 0.27). Reduced methylation was detected in the COL1A2 promoter in women with higher exposure to lead (P= 0.004), and an inverse correlation was observed (r = - 0.45, P= 0.03). Lower methylation of a promoter CpG site at the TSP50 gene was detected in women with higher BPA exposure (P= 0.005), and again an inverse correlation was identified (r = - 0.51, P= 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Altered DNA methylation at various CpG sites was associated with exposure to mercury, lead or BPA, providing candidates to be investigated using a larger study sample, as the results may reflect an independently associated predictor (e.g. socioeconomic status, diet, genetic variants, altered blood cell composition). Further studies accommodating variations in these factors will be needed to confirm these associations and identify their underlying causes.
BACKGROUND: Changes in DNA methylation may play an important role in the deleterious reproductive effects reported in association with exposure to environmental pollutants. In this pilot study, we identify candidate methylation changes associated with exposure to pollutants in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: Blood and urine were collected from women on the day of oocyte retrieval. Whole blood was analyzed for mercury and lead, and urine for cadmium using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Unconjugated bisphenol A (BPA) was analyzed in serum using high-performance liquid chromatography with Coularray detection. Participants were dichotomized as higher or lower exposure groups by median concentrations. Using the Illumina GoldenGate Methylation Cancer Panel I, DNA methylation in whole blood from 43 women was assessed at 1505 CpG sites for association with exposure levels of each pollutant. Candidate CpG sites were identified using a Diff Score >|13| (P< 0.05) and an absolute difference >10% which were confirmed using bisulfite pyrosequencing. RESULTS: Methylation of the GSTM1/5 promoter was increased for women with higher mercury exposure (P= 0.04); however, no correlation was observed (r= 0.17, P= 0.27). Reduced methylation was detected in the COL1A2 promoter in women with higher exposure to lead (P= 0.004), and an inverse correlation was observed (r = - 0.45, P= 0.03). Lower methylation of a promoter CpG site at the TSP50 gene was detected in women with higher BPA exposure (P= 0.005), and again an inverse correlation was identified (r = - 0.51, P= 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Altered DNA methylation at various CpG sites was associated with exposure to mercury, lead or BPA, providing candidates to be investigated using a larger study sample, as the results may reflect an independently associated predictor (e.g. socioeconomic status, diet, genetic variants, altered blood cell composition). Further studies accommodating variations in these factors will be needed to confirm these associations and identify their underlying causes.
Authors: Marian Valko; Dieter Leibfritz; Jan Moncol; Mark T D Cronin; Milan Mazur; Joshua Telser Journal: Int J Biochem Cell Biol Date: 2006-08-04 Impact factor: 5.085
Authors: Roberto Romero; Lara A Friel; Digna R Velez Edwards; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Sonia S Hassan; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Edi Vaisbuch; Chong Jai Kim; Offer Erez; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Brad D Pearce; Jacquelaine Bartlett; Benjamin A Salisbury; Madan Kumar Anant; Gerald F Vovis; Min Seob Lee; Ricardo Gomez; Ernesto Behnke; Enrique Oyarzun; Gerard Tromp; Scott M Williams; Ramkumar Menon Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Laura N Vandenberg; Ibrahim Chahoud; Jerrold J Heindel; Vasantha Padmanabhan; Francisco J R Paumgartten; Gilbert Schoenfelder Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Valentina Bollati; Andrea Baccarelli; Lifang Hou; Matteo Bonzini; Silvia Fustinoni; Domenico Cavallo; Hyang-Min Byun; Jiayi Jiang; Barbara Marinelli; Angela C Pesatori; Pier A Bertazzi; Allen S Yang Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Kelly M Bakulski; HwaJin Lee; Jason I Feinberg; Ellen M Wells; Shannon Brown; Julie B Herbstman; Frank R Witter; Rolf U Halden; Kathleen Caldwell; Mary Ellen Mortensen; Andrew E Jaffe; John Moye; Laura E Caulfield; Yi Pan; Lynn R Goldman; Andrew P Feinberg; M Daniele Fallin Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Jaclyn M Goodrich; Brisa N Sánchez; Dana C Dolinoy; Zhenzhen Zhang; Mauricio Hernández-Ávila; Howard Hu; Karen E Peterson; Martha M Téllez-Rojo Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Marie-Claude Senut; Pablo Cingolani; Arko Sen; Adele Kruger; Asra Shaik; Helmut Hirsch; Steven T Suhr; Douglas Ruden Journal: Epigenomics Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 4.778
Authors: Niladri Basu; Jessica Head; Dong-Ha Nam; J Richard Pilsner; Michael J Carvan; Hing Man Chan; Frederick W Goetz; Cheryl A Murphy; Kirsti Rouvinen-Watt; Anton M Scheuhammer Journal: Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 3.228