Literature DB >> 22381392

Efficacy of safety signals in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU): should we worry?

Hae W Shin1, Page B Pennell, Jong W Lee, Heidi Doucette, Shraddha Srinivasan, Barbara A Dworetzky.   

Abstract

There is little consensus regarding the critical safety measures to prevent harm in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). We sought to determine whether the safety signals (SS) triggered during EMU events differed by seizure type and the efficacy of SS in alerting responders. We screened 468 consecutive EMU admissions from January 2008 until April 2011 for definitive events to evaluate the first 50 events of complex partial seizures (CPS), generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTC), and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). Response to telemetry signal was slower than to push button (PB). When there was PB alarm, response time was slower in patients with PNES. A higher proportion of PNES were triggered by PB. A greater percentage of epileptic seizures were missed compared with PNES. Future studies investigating more effective techniques to capture every epileptic seizure are warranted as 24/7 monitoring by healthcare professionals is not feasible in many settings.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22381392     DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  1 in total

1.  Safety in the EMU: Reaching Consensus.

Authors:  Jong Woo Lee; Aashit Shah
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.500

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.