Literature DB >> 22381312

Predicting outcome after arteriovenous malformation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage with the original ICH score.

Geoffrey Appelboom1, Brian Y Hwang, Samuel S Bruce, Matthew A Piazza, Christopher P Kellner, Philip M Meyers, E Sander Connolly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive ability of the original ICH Score (oICH) in a large independent cohort of patients with arteriovenous malformation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (AVM-ICH), an important cause of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) that is associated with significantly different epidemiology, clinical course, and outcome compared with primary ICH.
METHODS: During the period 1997-2009, 91 patients were admitted to Columbia Medical Center with acute AVM-ICH. Demographic and admission clinical and radiographic variables were obtained for 84 patients through retrospective chart review. Admission oICH and Spetzler-Martin grading scale (SMGS) were calculated. Outcome was assessed at 3 months using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Maximum Youden Indices were used to identify cutoffs for age and ICH volume that are associated with optimal predictive accuracy for an unfavorable outcome (mRS ≥ 3). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the predictive performance of oICH, and oICH with new age and ICH cutoff points (new AVM-ICH score based on original ICH Score [AVM-oICH]).
RESULTS: The mean age was 35 years ± 14, and mean ICH volume was 22 mL ± 20. At 3-month follow-up, 3 (4%) patients were dead, and 15 (18%) had an unfavorable outcome. Two of the patients who died had oICH of 3, and one had oICH of 5. ICH volume of 37 mL and age of 41 years were identified as optimal cutoffs for predicting an unfavorable outcome. oICH and AVM-oICH showed good predictive accuracies with area under the curve of 0.914 and 0.891 (P = 0.422). AVM-oICH and oICH had similarly high sensitivities (0.889 and 0.944; P = 1.00), but the former had significantly greater specificity (0.879 vs. 0.682; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: oICH is a valid clinical grading scale with high predictive accuracy for functional outcome after AVM-ICH. It is unclear whether the score is appropriate for risk stratification with regard to mortality because of the low risk of death associated with AVM-ICH. Simple adjustments of the age and ICH volume cutoff points improve performance of the score and reduce the probability of overestimating a patient's risk of an unfavorable outcome after AVM-ICH.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22381312     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  10 in total

1.  Is using intracerebral hemorrhage scoring systems valid for mortality prediction in surgically treated patients?

Authors:  Sukwoo Hong; Keisuke Maruyama; Akio Noguchi; Teruyuki Hirano; Motoo Nagane; Yoshiaki Shiokawa
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Scoping Review and Commentary on Prognostication for Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Advances in Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Stephanie Zyck; Lydia Du; Grahame Gould; Julius Gene Latorre; Timothy Beutler; Alexa Bodman; Satish Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Assessment and Comparison of the Four Most Extensively Validated Prognostic Scales for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiago Gregório; Sara Pipa; Pedro Cavaleiro; Gabriel Atanásio; Inês Albuquerque; Paulo Castro Chaves; Luís Azevedo
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Autophagy Promotes Microglia Activation Through Beclin-1-Atg5 Pathway in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Bangqing Yuan; Hanchao Shen; Li Lin; Tonggang Su; Lina Zhong; Zhao Yang
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 5.590

5.  Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage volume and distribution in brain arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  Jay F Yu; Andrew D Nicholson; Jeffrey Nelson; Matthew D Alexander; Stephanie H Tse; Steven W Hetts; J Claude Hemphill; Helen Kim; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Ruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Surgical Timing and Outcomes-A Retrospective Study of 25 Cases.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Bartolomeo; Anthony Kevin Scafa; Marco Giugliano; Demo Eugenio Dugoni; Andrea Gennaro Ruggeri; Roberto Delfini
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2020-11-04

7.  External validation of brain arteriovenous malformation haemorrhage scores, AVICH, ICH and R2eD.

Authors:  Basel A Taweel; Conor S Gillespie; George E Richardson; Mohammad A Mustafa; Tamara Ali; Abdurrahman I Islim; Cathal J Hannan; Emmanuel Chavredakis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  Pipeline Flex Embolization of Flow-Related Aneurysms Associated with Arteriovenous Malformations: A Case Report.

Authors:  Narlin B Beaty; Jessica K Campos; Geoffrey P Colby; Li-Mei Lin; Matthew T Bender; Risheng Xu; Alexander L Coon
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2018-02-03

9.  Prognostic models for intracerebral hemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiago Gregório; Sara Pipa; Pedro Cavaleiro; Gabriel Atanásio; Inês Albuquerque; Paulo Castro Chaves; Luís Azevedo
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  Systematic review of brain arteriovenous malformation grading systems evaluating microsurgical treatment recommendation.

Authors:  Basil E Grüter; Wenhua Sun; Jorn Fierstra; Luca Regli; Menno R Germans
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.042

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.