Literature DB >> 22381310

Visual complications after stent-assisted endovascular embolization of paraophthalmic and suprasellar variant superior hypophyseal aneurysms: the Duke Cerebrovascular Center experience in 57 patients.

Andrew S Ferrell1, Mark L Lessne, Michael J Alexander, Pratish Shah, Kiarash Golshani, Ali Zomorodi, Tony P Smith, Gavin W Britz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review retrospectively experience with stent-assisted coiling of ophthalmic segment internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms to report outcome data and identify the rate of associated visual complications.
METHODS: The Duke endovascular database was retrospectively reviewed to identify all ICA aneurysms treated with stent-assisted embolization between November 2002 and October 2009. Only aneurysms arising from the ophthalmic segment of the ICA and originating from the paraophthalmic or suprasellar variant superior hypophyseal artery were included. These aneurysms have the potential to create visual disturbances related to mass effect on the optic nerve or chiasm or to disrupt the ophthalmic artery. Chart review was performed to obtain clinical information, immediate incidence, and follow-up of aneurysm remnants and any visual complications.
RESULTS: There were 63 aneurysms (48 paraophthalmic and 15 suprasellar variant superior hypophyseal) identified in 57 patients. The ophthalmic artery was preserved in all but two (3.5%) cases, neither of which resulted in visual deficits. One (1.8%) patient experienced transient acute visual disturbances, and two (3.5%) patients had delayed, persistent deficits.
CONCLUSIONS: Stent-assisted embolization of ophthalmic segment ICA aneurysms is technically achievable and in our series did not appear to result in increased visual complications compared with coil embolization alone or surgical treatment.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22381310     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  7 in total

1.  Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Paraclinoid Aneurysms: Single-Center Experience with 400 Cases and Literature Review.

Authors:  K Shimizu; H Imamura; Y Mineharu; H Adachi; C Sakai; N Sakai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Endovascular treatment of ophthalmic artery aneurysms: assessing balloon test occlusion and preservation of vision in coil embolization.

Authors:  J H Ahn; Y D Cho; H-S Kang; J E Kim; W-S Cho; S C Jung; C H Kim; M H Han
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Clinical outcome of paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms after microsurgical neck clipping in comparison with endovascular embolization.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Bae; Jae-Min Kim; Yu-Deok Won; Kyu-Sun Choi; Jin-Hwan Cheong; Hyeong-Joong Yi; Choong-Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2014-09-30

4.  Central Retinal Artery Occlusion after the Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Ophthalmic Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report and a Literature Review.

Authors:  Alaa Mohammed Elkordy; Kenichi Sato; Yasuhide Inoue; Yui Mano; Yasushi Matsumoto; Akira Takahashi; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  NMC Case Rep J       Date:  2016-05-19

5.  Comparison of Pipeline Embolization and Coil Embolization for the Treatment of Large Unruptured Paraclinoid Aneurysms.

Authors:  Ryotaro Suzuki; Tomoji Takigawa; Yasuhiko Nariai; Akio Hyodo; Kensuke Suzuki
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Efficacy of pipeline embolization device vs. traditional coils in embolization of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Li; Zaixing Xiao; Kaixuan Zhao; Shijie Yang; Yichuan Zhang; Bin Li; Yu Zhou; Yong Ma; Erqing Chai
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Visual complications after coil embolization of internal carotid artery aneurysms at the ophthalmic segment.

Authors:  Shotaro Michishita; Toshihiro Ishibashi; Ichiro Yuki; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Kostadin Karagiozov; Tomonobu Kodama; Issei Kan; Kengo Nishimura; Naoki Kato; Ayako Ikemura; Yuichi Murayama
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 1.764

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.