Literature DB >> 22381193

Syndesmotic fixation in supination-external rotation ankle fractures: a prospective randomized study.

Harri J Pakarinen1, Tapio E Flinkkilä, Pasi P Ohtonen, Pekka H Hyvönen, Martti T Lakovaara, Juhana I Leppilahti, Jukka Y Ristiniemi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess whether transfixion of an unstable syndesmosis is necessary in supination-external rotation (Lauge-Hansen SE/Weber B)-type ankle fractures.
METHODS: A prospective study of 140 patients with unilateral Lauge-Hansen supination-external rotation type 4 ankle fractures was done. After bony fixation, the 7.5-Nm standardized external rotation (ER) stress test for both ankles was performed under fluoroscopy. A positive stress examination was defined as a difference of more than 2 mm side-to-side in the tibiotalar or tibiofibular clear spaces on mortise radiographs. If the stress test was positive, the patient was randomized to either syndesmotic transfixion with 3.5-mm tricortical screws or no syndesmotic fixation. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander scoring system, RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure pain and function after a minimum 1-year of followup.
RESULTS: Twenty four (17%) of 140 patients had positive standardized 7.5-Nm ER stress tests after malleolar fixation. The stress view was positive three times on tibiotalar clear space, seven on tibiofibular clear space, and 14 times on both tibiotalar and tibiofibular clear spaces. There was no significant difference between the two randomization groups with regards to Olerud-Molander functional score, VAS scale measuring pain and function, or RAND 36-Item Health Survey pain or physical function at 1 year.
CONCLUSION: Relevant syndesmotic injuries are rare in supination-external rotation ankle fractures, and syndesmotic transfixion with a screw did not influence the functional outcome or pain after the 1-year followup compared with no fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22381193     DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  14 in total

1.  Reply to Letter regarding article by Wang et al: "Internal fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis".

Authors:  Chen Wang; Xin Ma; Xu Wang; Jiazhang Huang; Chao Zhang; Li Chen; Jian Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Letter regarding article by Wang et al., "Internal fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis".

Authors:  Mingbo Tian; Mingsheng Zhang; Xiaowei Guo; Shoufeng Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Dynamic fixation is superior in terms of clinical outcomes to static fixation in managing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

Authors:  Kaifeng Gan; Dingli Xu; Keqi Hu; Wei Wu; Yandong Shen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Current trends in the diagnosis and management of syndesmotic injury.

Authors:  Matthew L Vopat; Bryan G Vopat; Bart Lubberts; Christopher W DiGiovanni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 5.  An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  S Rammelt; P Obruba
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device.

Authors:  Christian Colcuc; Marc Blank; Thomas Stein; Florian Raimann; Sanjay Weber-Spickschen; Sebastian Fischer; Reinhard Hoffmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Internal fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Xin Ma; Xu Wang; Jiazhang Huang; Chao Zhang; Li Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Type B ankle fractures: a retrospective study of longer-term outcomes.

Authors:  Rajat Mittal; Prajith Jeyaprakash; Ian A Harris; Justine M Naylor
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-07-28

9.  Surgery for Type B Ankle Fracture Treatment: a Combined Randomised and Observational Study (CROSSBAT).

Authors:  Rajat Mittal; Ian A Harris; Sam Adie; Justine M Naylor
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Interventions for treating ankle fractures in children.

Authors:  Denise E Yeung; Xueli Jia; Clare A Miller; Simon L Barker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.