Literature DB >> 22378286

Spontaneous disclosure of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to employers: a French prospective study.

François Eisinger1, Roxane Fabre, Christine Lasset, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Claire Julian-Reynier, Catherine Nogues.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the patterns of disclosure of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to employers by unaffected carriers. In a national prospective cohort study on unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, disclosure to employers was assessed prospectively, using self-administered questionnaires, up to 2 years after their test results were delivered by cancer geneticists. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-regression analysis were used to assess the factors associated with time to disclosure to the employer. Mean age of the 146 women BRCA1/2 carriers who were employed when their test results were delivered was 37.1 years (range: 19-57). At the end of the second year of follow-up, 47 of them (32.2%) had disclosed their results to their employers; median time to disclosure was 6 months. Reasons spontaneously expressed were first to inform the employer that medical surveillance/surgery was necessary for cancer risk management although these carriers did not actually have cancer. After multivariate adjustment on age, women with a lower educational level (HRadj=2.00, P=0.026) and those who had undergone prophylactic surgery during the 2 years of follow-up (HRadj=2.18, P=0.019) had disclosed their BRCA status to their employers earlier and more frequently. One-third of the female carriers not affected by breast/ovarian cancer disclosed their BRCA1/2 genetic test results spontaneously to their employers, mainly to inform them that they were disease-free but required medical surveillance or a surgical intervention to reduce the risk of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22378286      PMCID: PMC3421122          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  13 in total

Review 1.  Genetic information and testing in insurance and employment: technical, social and ethical issues.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Sandy Raeburn; Marcus Pembrey; Martin Bobrow; Peter Farndon; Ségolène Aymé
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Essentially yours: the protection of human genetic information in Australia.

Authors:  Margaret Otlowski
Journal:  Genewatch       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

Review 3.  Social and ethical implications of BRCA testing.

Authors:  A Surbone
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Genetic discrimination in Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Aad Tibben
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-09

5.  Genetic discrimination.

Authors:  J J Duby
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-11-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Perceptions of discrimination among persons who have undergone predictive testing for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth Penziner; Janet K Williams; Cheryl Erwin; Yvonne Bombard; Anne Wallis; Leigh J Beglinger; Michael R Hayden; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 3.568

7.  Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.

Authors:  M Horowitz; N Wilner; W Alvarez
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.312

8.  Verification of consumers' experiences and perceptions of genetic discrimination and its impact on utilization of genetic testing.

Authors:  Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Sandra D Taylor; Susan A Treloar; Mark Stranger; Margaret Otlowski
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study.

Authors:  M Marmot; A Feeney; M Shipley; F North; S L Syme
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington's disease: a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Gerry Veenstra; Jan M Friedman; Susan Creighton; Lauren Currie; Jane S Paulsen; Joan L Bottorff; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Concerns about Genetic Testing for Schizophrenia among Young Adults at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Authors:  Ryan E Lawrence; Phoebe Friesen; Gary Brucato; Ragy R Girgis; Lisa Dixon
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-11-16

2.  "Maybe they have found something new" participants' views on returning cohort psychosocial survey results.

Authors:  Eve Bureau; Isabelle Pellegrini; Catherine Noguès; Christine Lasset; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Disclosure of research results: a randomized study on GENEPSO-PS cohort participants.

Authors:  Julien Mancini; Elodie Le Cozannet; Anne-Déborah Bouhnik; Noémie Resseguier; Christine Lasset; Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme; Catherine Noguès; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Validation of a scale for assessing attitudes towards outcomes of genetic cancer testing among primary care providers and breast specialists.

Authors:  Anne-Deborah Bouhnik; Khadim N'Diaye; D Gareth Evans; Hilary Harris; Aad Tibben; Christi van Asperen; Joerg Schmidtke; Irmgard Nippert; Julien Mancini; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.