Literature DB >> 22378199

Perceived risk of nuclear power and other risks during the last 25 years in Japan.

Reiko Kanda1, Satsuki Tsuji, Hidenori Yonehara.   

Abstract

The present study described the results of three "fixed-point" surveys on perceived risk related to a list of social and individual risk events during 25 years in Japan. Female clerical staff and researchers were asked to rank 30 items related to various types of technologies and human activities according to their subjective judgments on the order of perceived magnitude of risk in 1983, 1992, and 2007. A similar survey was undertaken for Japanese citizens using web-based questionnaires in 2007. In general, the risk perceptions of the Japanese people, irrespective of gender, age, and occupation, have been uniform during the last 25 years. The female clerical staffs have consistently judged nuclear power as most risky during the last 25 years, whereas researchers' judgment fluctuated with events such as the Chernobyl accident. The ranking of the risk of motor vehicles fell during the 25-y period, whereas those of health risks with food preservatives, x-rays, and antibiotics rose transiently in the 1992 survey. During the 15 years from 1992 to 2007, people tended to learn how to accommodate themselves to these technologies with low risks in exchange for high benefits, except in the case of nuclear power. Nuclear power was regarded as a high-risk item by the Japanese even before the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in March 2011. This partly explains that the crisis inevitably provokes further high risk perception in Japan, although the overall health threat to the human population in Japan is estimated to be relatively limited so far.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22378199     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31823abef2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  7 in total

Review 1.  Risk Communication Strategies: Lessons Learned from Previous Disasters with a Focus on the Fukushima Radiation Accident.

Authors:  Erik R Svendsen; Ichiro Yamaguchi; Toshihide Tsuda; Jean Remy Davee Guimaraes; Martin Tondel
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2016-12

2.  Searching for the New Behavioral Model in Energy Transition Age: Analyzing the Forward and Reverse Causal Relationships between Belief, Attitude, and Behavior in Nuclear Policy across Countries.

Authors:  Byoung Joon Kim; Seoyong Kim; Youngcheoul Kang; Sohee Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Psychological distress and the perception of radiation risks: the Fukushima health management survey.

Authors:  Yuriko Suzuki; Hirooki Yabe; Seiji Yasumura; Tetsuya Ohira; Shin-Ichi Niwa; Akira Ohtsuru; Hirobumi Mashiko; Masaharu Maeda; Masafumi Abe
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  An Exploratory Analysis of Public Awareness and Perception of Ionizing Radiation and Guide to Public Health Practice in Vermont.

Authors:  Katherine M Evans; Jenna Bodmer; Bryce Edwards; James Levins; Amanda O'Meara; Merima Ruhotina; Richard Smith; Thomas Delaney; Razelle Hoffman-Contois; Linda Boccuzzo; Heidi Hales; Jan K Carney
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2015-04-28

5.  Severe Psychological Distress of Evacuees in Evacuation Zone Caused by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Authors:  Yasuto Kunii; Yuriko Suzuki; Tetsuya Shiga; Hirooki Yabe; Seiji Yasumura; Masaharu Maeda; Shin-Ichi Niwa; Akira Otsuru; Hirobumi Mashiko; Masafumi Abe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Changes in Risk Perception of the Health Effects of Radiation and Mental Health Status: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Authors:  Yuriko Suzuki; Yoshitake Takebayashi; Seiji Yasumura; Michio Murakami; Mayumi Harigane; Hirooki Yabe; Tetsuya Ohira; Akira Ohtsuru; Satomi Nakajima; Masaharu Maeda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Searching for New Directions for Energy Policy: Testing Three Causal Models of Risk Perception, Attitude, and Behavior in Nuclear Energy Context.

Authors:  Byoung Joon Kim; Seoyong Kim; Sunhee Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.