Literature DB >> 22377761

Genetic requirement for ADAM10 in severe Staphylococcus aureus skin infection.

Naoko Inoshima, Yang Wang, Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22377761      PMCID: PMC3326222          DOI: 10.1038/jid.2011.462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


× No keyword cloud information.

TO THE EDITOR

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of human skin infections, contributing to disease in both healthy and immunocompromised individuals, also complicating burn and surgical wound sites and lesions of atopic dermatitis (Lowy, 1998; Ong and Leung, 2010). Host defense against staphylococcal skin infection is multifaceted, relying on local immunologic control through TH17 and IL-1β–driven recruitment of neutrophils in addition to the protective actions of antimicrobial peptides and physical properties of the cutaneous barrier (Miller and Cho, 2011). Pathogen virulence in staphylococcal skin infection is likewise multifactorial (Weidenmaier ), relying in part on the action of α-hemolysin, a pore-forming cytotoxin secreted by almost all strains of S. aureus. Hla is required for dermonecrotic changes during infection, also contributing to abscess size (Kennedy ). Immunization strategies targeting Hla protect against dermonecrosis (Kennedy ), however the molecular mechanism by which the toxin causes pathologic disturbance of the epithelial barrier is ill-understood. We recently identified the zinc-dependent metalloprotease ADAM10 as the cellular receptor for Hla (Wilke and Bubeck Wardenburg, 2010). ADAM10 regulates epithelial function through its ability to cleave E-cadherin, severing the protein-based adherens junction tether between adjacent cells (Maretzky ). ADAM10 knockout mice exhibit embryonic lethality (Hartmann ), while conditional skin knockout of ADAM10 during gestation or in the postnatal epidermis results in marked dysregulation of epithelial differentiation and barrier function (Weber ). To examine the contribution of ADAM10 to skin infection, we generated conditional knockout mice in which exon 3 of ADAM10 is flanked by loxP sites (Tian ), excised in the presence of a Cre recombinase expressed under control of the keratin 14 promoter (Vasioukhin ). Topical application of tamoxifen (TAM) to a 1cm2 skin area for 5 days leads to localized ADAM10 genomic excision (Fig. S1a and b), abrogating epidermal ADAM10 expression (Fig. 1a, ADAM10−/−). In contrast to littermate controls, ADAM10−/− mice did not develop dermonecrotic lesions following subcutaneous infection with 3 × 107 colony forming units of the epidemic S. aureus USA300/LAC (Figs. 1b and c). Abscess size was reduced in ADAM10−/− mice (Fig. 1d), however lesional bacterial recovery was unaltered (Fig. S1c).
Fig. 1

ADAM10 mediates α-hemolysin dependent epithelial injury. (a) Epidermal expression of ADAM10 visualized by anti-mouse ADAM10 immunohistochemical staining of tissues derived from ADAM10−/− mice in which topical treatment with tamoxifen (TAM, dissolved in ethanol, 1 mg per mouse per day for 5 days, applied to a 1 cm2 area) induces loss of ADAM10 expression through Cre recombinase-mediated excision of ADAM10loxP alleles or control mice treated with ethanol alone. (b) Dermonecrosis area recorded from control mice that received topical treatment with vehicle alone (n = 13) or TAM (n = 8), or ADAM10−/− mice treated with TAM (n = 13) followed by subcutaneous infection at the site of vehicle or TAM application with 3 × 107 S. aureus USA300/LAC, where * denotes P < 0.001. (c) Image of mice treated as described in (b) and (d). (d) Abscess area recorded from mice detailed in (b) where + denotes P < 0.05. Area in (b) and (d) was calculated based on the formula A = [π/2] × length × width where error bars represent SEM. All animal studies were reviewed, approved, and supervised by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Chicago. (e) Cell-associated metalloprotease activity measured in A431 keratinocytes following treatment with 10 Rg ml−1 (300 nM) active Hla or the non-toxigenic mutant HlaH35L at the time points indicated. Activity was quantified by detection of the product derived from cleavage of the fluorogenic peptide substrate Mca-PLAQAV-Dpa-RSSSR-NH2 (10 RM, R&D Systems, Minnesota) diluted in 25 mM Tris, pH 8.0. (f) Immunoblot analysis of full-length (Fl) E-cadherin and accumulation of the C-terminal cleavage fragment (Ctf) following treatment of A431 cells with controls DMSO and ionomycin compared to 10 Rg ml−1 HlaH35L or Hla over the time course indicated. (g) Electrical cell substrate impedance sensing (ECIS, Applied Biophysics, New York) recordings of A431 monolayers treated with PBS (black), the HlaH35L mutant (10 Rg ml−1, red), or active Hla (10 Rg ml−1, blue). (h) E-cadherin (green) immunofluorescence microscopy analysis of tissue from control or ADAM10−/− mice 24 hours following infection with 3 × 107 S. aureus delivered by subcutaneous route. Nuclei (blue) are stained with the fluorescent DNA stain DAPI. (i) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissues from mice treated as described in (h), shown at 4X (upper) with a 20X image of the highlighted area (lower). The site of infection and inflammatory cell recruitment is marked by yellow arrows. Scale bars in (a) = 50 μm, (h) = 10 μm, (i) = 100 μm.

The ability of ADAM10 to cleave E-cadherin suggested that Hla may utilize its receptor to cause epithelial barrier injury, not merely to facilitate binding. Toxin treatment of A431 keratinocytes led to upregulation of cell-associated metalloprotease activity measured in a fluorogenic substrate assay; the non-pore-forming HlaH35L mutant did not elicit this response (Fig. 1e). Enhanced metalloprotease activity correlated with E-cadherin cleavage, detectable by immunoblot analysis of E-cadherin precipitates from A431 lysates as the toxin-induced loss of full-length (Fl) protein and C-terminal fragment (Ctf) accumulation produced by ADAM10-dependent cleavage (Fig. 1f). Ctf accumulation was also observed in cultured primary keratinocytes upon toxin treatment (Fig. S1d). These molecular events occurred at subcytolytic concentrations of Hla (10 μg per ml, data not shown), wherein a disturbance of cell-cell interactions in an A431 monolayer was manifest as a loss of resistance to the passage of an electrical current using electrical cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS, Fig. 1g). These findings suggest that the principal role of the toxin-receptor complex may be to disrupt the epithelial barrier. Within 24 hours following S. aureus infection, loss of E-cadherin surface expression in epidermal tissue overlying the infection was evident in control mice as compared to ADAM10−/− mice (Fig. 1h). Inflammatory cell infiltration at the infection site was similar in both control and ADAM10−/− mice (Fig. 1i, upper, arrows), however epidermal loss was apparent overlying the abscess site only in control mice (Fig. 1i, lower). Together with CFU analysis, these results indicate that the Hla-ADAM10 complex does not markedly alter the host response to infection or bacterial accumulation. Epithelial injury induced by the toxin-receptor complex likely contributes to tissue edema and increased lesional size observed in control mice (Fig. 1d). These data raised the possibility that an enzymatic inhibitor of ADAM10 may protect the epithelium. Mice receiving systemic treatment with the ADAM10 inhibitor GI254023X (Ludwig ) (200 mg per kg per day, five days) did not demonstrate dermonecrotic lesions following infection compared to mice treated with the DMSO vehicle (Fig. 2a). Topical application of GI254023X also prevented skin breakdown (Fig. 2b, 100 mg per kg per day, five days). Both routes of treatment led to a reduction in abscess size (data not shown). In vitro, GI254023X treatment preserved E-cadherin expression and epithelial barrier function in toxin-treated A431 cells (Figs. 2c and d).
Fig. 2

An ADAM10 inhibitor protects against Hla-induced injury. (a) Dermonecrosis area recorded from wild-type mice that received a five-day course of once-daily intraperitoneal injection with vehicle alone (DMSO) or the ADAM10 inhibitor GI254023X (200 mg per kg per day, Okeanos, China), followed by subcutaneous infection with 3 × 107 S. aureus USA300/LAC (n = 10 mice per group). (b) Dermonecrosis area recorded from wild-type mice that received a five-day course of once-daily topical application with vehicle alone (DMSO) or the ADAM10 inhibitor GI254023X (100 mg per kg per day), followed by subcutaneous infection with 3 × 10 S. aureus USA300/LAC (n = 10 mice per group), where + denotes P < 0.05 and * denotes P < 0.001 in (a) and (b). (c) Immunoblot analysis of full-length E-cadherin (Fl) and accumulation of the C-terminal cleavage fragment (Ctf) following pre-treatment of A431 cells with DMSO or GI254023X, then exposed to 10 Rg ml−1 Hla for the time periods indicated. (d) Electrical cell substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) recordings of A431 monolayers treated with PBS (black), or Hla (10 Rg ml−1) following pre-treatment with control DMSO (blue) or GI254023X (20 Rg ml−1, red).

These studies provide insight into pathogenesis of staphylococcal skin infection demonstrating a genetic requirement for ADAM10 expression to mediate epithelial barrier injury, which to our knowledge is previously unreported. The Hla-ADAM10 complex thereby disables the most innate host defense of the skin. These findings extend recent observations that demonstrate a role for ADAM10 in Hla-mediated injury to the lung epithelium and vascular endothelium (Inoshima ; Powers ), defining a generalized principle of toxin action in which Hla utilizes its cellular receptor as a means to bind host cells and cause barrier injury. As ADAM10 cleaves muItiple cellular substrates, it is of considerable interest to now understand the potential role of these proteins in staphylococcal disease pathogenesis. These observations have important implications for S. aureus skin disease. First, Hla may facilitate an initial breach of intact skin to permit pathogen invasion. Second, ADAM10 polymorphisms that alter toxin binding or enzymatic activity may exist, impacting susceptibility to infection. Finally, in disease states characterized by a compromise of epithelial barrier function such as atopic dermatitis, S. aureus may potentiate or incite barrier disruption, contributing to pathology and facilitating niche establishment. Indeed, S. aureus is the most common bacterial pathogen complicating atopic dermatitis lesions (Ong and Leung, 2010). Studies implicating ADAM10 in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis (Maretzky ), together with our observations, suggest that the Hla-ADAM10 interaction may contribute to epidermal pathology over a continuum of staphylococcal skin disease ranging from acute infection to chronic barrier insults. Therapies impacting ADAM10 activity may therefore demonstrate broad clinical utility.
  15 in total

1.  Role of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 in Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin-mediated cellular injury.

Authors:  Georgia A Wilke; Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Targeting of alpha-hemolysin by active or passive immunization decreases severity of USA300 skin infection in a mouse model.

Authors:  Adam D Kennedy; Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg; Donald J Gardner; Daniel Long; Adeline R Whitney; Kevin R Braughton; Olaf Schneewind; Frank R DeLeo
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  ADAM10 mediates E-cadherin shedding and regulates epithelial cell-cell adhesion, migration, and beta-catenin translocation.

Authors:  Thorsten Maretzky; Karina Reiss; Andreas Ludwig; Julian Buchholz; Felix Scholz; Erhardt Proksch; Bart de Strooper; Dieter Hartmann; Paul Saftig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  ADAM10 mediates vascular injury induced by Staphylococcus aureus α-hemolysin.

Authors:  Michael E Powers; Hwan Keun Kim; Yang Wang; Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  Metalloproteinase inhibitors for the disintegrin-like metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17 that differentially block constitutive and phorbol ester-inducible shedding of cell surface molecules.

Authors:  Andreas Ludwig; Christian Hundhausen; Millard H Lambert; Neil Broadway; Robert C Andrews; D Mark Bickett; M Anthony Leesnitzer; J David Becherer
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.339

6.  The magical touch: genome targeting in epidermal stem cells induced by tamoxifen application to mouse skin.

Authors:  V Vasioukhin; L Degenstein; B Wise; E Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  ADAM10-mediated E-cadherin release is regulated by proinflammatory cytokines and modulates keratinocyte cohesion in eczematous dermatitis.

Authors:  Thorsten Maretzky; Felix Scholz; Bente Köten; Ehrhardt Proksch; Paul Saftig; Karina Reiss
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  The disintegrin/metalloprotease ADAM 10 is essential for Notch signalling but not for alpha-secretase activity in fibroblasts.

Authors:  Dieter Hartmann; Bart de Strooper; Lutgarde Serneels; Katleen Craessaerts; An Herreman; Wim Annaert; Lieve Umans; Torben Lübke; Anna Lena Illert; Kurt von Figura; Paul Saftig
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  ADAM10 is essential for proteolytic activation of Notch during thymocyte development.

Authors:  Lei Tian; Xiaohui Wu; Congwu Chi; Min Han; Tian Xu; Yuan Zhuang
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.823

Review 10.  The infectious aspects of atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Peck Y Ong; Donald Y M Leung
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.479

View more
  57 in total

1.  The ever-emerging complexity of α-toxin's interaction with host cells.

Authors:  Ashira Lubkin; Victor J Torres
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neutralizing Alpha-Toxin Accelerates Healing of Staphylococcus aureus-Infected Wounds in Nondiabetic and Diabetic Mice.

Authors:  Roger V Ortines; Haiyun Liu; Lily I Cheng; Taylor S Cohen; Heather Lawlor; Abhishek Gami; Yu Wang; Carly A Dillen; Nathan K Archer; Robert J Miller; Alyssa G Ashbaugh; Bret L Pinsker; Mark C Marchitto; Christine Tkaczyk; C Kendall Stover; Bret R Sellman; Lloyd S Miller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Staphylococcus aureus Alpha-Toxin Disrupts Endothelial-Cell Tight Junctions via Acid Sphingomyelinase and Ceramide.

Authors:  Björn Fahsel; Hannes Kemper; Joelina Mayeres; Katrin Anne Becker; Cao Li; Barbara Wilker; Simone Keitsch; Matthias Soddemann; Carolin Sehl; Marcus Kohnen; Michael J Edwards; Heike Grassmé; Charles C Caldwell; Aaron Seitz; Martin Fraunholz; Erich Gulbins
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Staphylococcus aureus toxin suppresses antigen-specific T cell responses.

Authors:  Brandon Lee; Reuben Olaniyi; Jakub M Kwiecinski; Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  α-Toxin Regulates Local Granulocyte Expansion from Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells in Staphylococcus aureus-Infected Wounds.

Authors:  Patrick C Falahee; Leif S Anderson; Mack B Reynolds; Mauricio Pirir; Bridget E McLaughlin; Carly A Dillen; Ambrose L Cheung; Lloyd S Miller; Scott I Simon
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Synergistic Action of Staphylococcus aureus α-Toxin on Platelets and Myeloid Lineage Cells Contributes to Lethal Sepsis.

Authors:  Michael E Powers; Russell E N Becker; Anne Sailer; Jerrold R Turner; Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 21.023

Review 7.  Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming toxins: The interface of pathogen and host complexity.

Authors:  E Sachiko Seilie; Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 8.  Pore-forming bacterial toxins and antimicrobial peptides as modulators of ADAM function.

Authors:  Karina Reiss; Sucharit Bhakdi
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  A serologic correlate of protective immunity against community-onset Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Stephanie A Fritz; Kristin M Tiemann; Patrick G Hogan; Emma K Epplin; Marcela Rodriguez; Duha N Al-Zubeidi; Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg; David A Hunstad
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Assessment of an anti-alpha-toxin monoclonal antibody for prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus-induced pneumonia.

Authors:  L Hua; J J Hilliard; Y Shi; C Tkaczyk; L I Cheng; X Yu; V Datta; S Ren; H Feng; R Zinsou; A Keller; T O'Day; Q Du; L Cheng; M Damschroder; G Robbie; J Suzich; C K Stover; B R Sellman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.