BACKGROUND: While the p-value will tell the reader a study's results are statistically significant, it does not provide any information about the practical or clinical importance of the findings. Furthermore, p-values are influenced by sample size. They are more likely to be significant when sample size is large and less likely if the sample is small. Effect size estimates, on the other hand, are not sensitive to sample size and provide information about the direction and strength of the relationship between variables (e.g., a treatment and an outcome). In addition to providing valuable clinical information about study findings, effect size estimates can provide a common metric to compare results across studies. Despite their usefulness, effect size estimates are often not reported as part of the research results. Consequently, effect sizes often have to be calculated based on summary and test statistics reported in research articles. RESULTS: This article provides the formulas utilized to directly calculate common effective size estimates using summary statistics reported in research studies, as well as methods to more indirectly estimate these effect sizes when basis summary statistics are not reported. In addition we present formulas to compute the corresponding confidence interval for each effect size.
BACKGROUND: While the p-value will tell the reader a study's results are statistically significant, it does not provide any information about the practical or clinical importance of the findings. Furthermore, p-values are influenced by sample size. They are more likely to be significant when sample size is large and less likely if the sample is small. Effect size estimates, on the other hand, are not sensitive to sample size and provide information about the direction and strength of the relationship between variables (e.g., a treatment and an outcome). In addition to providing valuable clinical information about study findings, effect size estimates can provide a common metric to compare results across studies. Despite their usefulness, effect size estimates are often not reported as part of the research results. Consequently, effect sizes often have to be calculated based on summary and test statistics reported in research articles. RESULTS: This article provides the formulas utilized to directly calculate common effective size estimates using summary statistics reported in research studies, as well as methods to more indirectly estimate these effect sizes when basis summary statistics are not reported. In addition we present formulas to compute the corresponding confidence interval for each effect size.
Authors: Daniela Rodrigues; Joana Pinto; Ana Margarida Araújo; Sara Monteiro-Reis; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Paula Guedes de Pinho; Márcia Carvalho Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Bárbara Matos; Daniela Patrício; Magda C Henriques; Maria J Freitas; Rui Vitorino; Iola F Duarte; John Howl; Paula A Oliveira; Fernanda Seixas; José A Duarte; Rita Ferreira; Margarida Fardilha Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Flávio Dionísio; Ana Margarida Araújo; Margarida Duarte-Araújo; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Paula Guedes de Pinho; Félix Carvalho; Vera Marisa Costa Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Ana Margarida Araújo; Márcia Carvalho; Vera Marisa Costa; José Alberto Duarte; Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Paula Guedes de Pinho; Félix Carvalho Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Márcia S Monteiro; António S Barros; Joana Pinto; Márcia Carvalho; Ana S Pires-Luís; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Ana M Gil; Paula Guedes de Pinho Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Prashant K Srivastava; Paolo Roncon; Katarzyna Lukasiuk; Jan A Gorter; Eleonora Aronica; Asla Pitkänen; Enrico Petretto; Michael R Johnson; Michele Simonato Journal: eNeuro Date: 2017-12-28
Authors: Inês Laíns; Daniela Duarte; António S Barros; Ana Sofia Martins; Tatiana J Carneiro; João Q Gil; John B Miller; Marco Marques; Tânia S Mesquita; Patrícia Barreto; Ivana K Kim; Maria da Luz Cachulo; Demetrios G Vavvas; Isabel M Carreira; Joaquim Neto Murta; Rufino Silva; Joan W Miller; Deeba Husain; Ana M Gil Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Deborah Hilderson; Rene Westhovens; Carine Wouters; Kristien Van der Elst; Eva Goossens; Philip Moons Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 2.692