Literature DB >> 2237720

Stapling or suturing for anastomoses of the left side of the large intestine.

P J Friend1, R Scott, W G Everett, I H Scott.   

Abstract

Two hundred and fifty patients undergoing elective surgical treatment involving anastomoses of the left side of the colon or colon and rectum have been studied in a randomized trial in which the EEA (U. S. Surgical Corp.) circular stapler has been compared with single layer sutured anastomoses. Only patients in whom either technique was feasible were included in the analysis. The operative techniques were largely standardized. Patients were studied by means of a limited barium enema on the ninth or tenth postoperative day. The data have been analyzed for leakage rate (clinical and roentgenologic), other complications and degree of experience of the surgeon. Eleven patients were excluded from the analysis because the selected technique could not be carried out; of these, eight were in the stapled group in which it was possible to perform a sutured anastomosis. There were no instances in which it was possible to staple but not possible to suture. The remaining three exclusions were patients in whom either a coloanal anastomosis or a Hartmann procedure was performed. There was no over-all difference in the leakage rate--roentgenologic, clinical or total--between the two groups. However, when analyzed by the surgeon, the clinical leakage rate for surgeons in training was greater for sutured anastomoses than for stapled anastomoses (p = 0.053). Thus, it appears that the benefits of experience are more pronounced for sutured anastomoses but that, in experienced hands, neither technique is superior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2237720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  9 in total

1.  Bowel anastomoses: The theory, the practice and the evidence base.

Authors:  Frances Goulder
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-27

2.  The lower limit of tissue blood flow for safe colonic anastomosis: an experimental study using laser Doppler velocimetry.

Authors:  H Kashiwagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Full robot-assisted gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis produces satisfying outcomes.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Liu; Zhi-Wei Jiang; Ping Chen; Yan Zhao; Hua-Feng Pan; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques.

Authors:  Jana Steger; Alissa Jell; Stefanie Ficht; Daniel Ostler; Markus Eblenkamp; Petra Mela; Dirk Wilhelm
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.755

5.  Preoperative combined treatment with radiation, intraluminal hyperthermia, and 5-fluorouracil suppositories for patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  T Takahashi; H Horie; O Kojima; M Itoh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Single- versus two- layer intestinal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Satoru Shikata; Hisakazu Yamagishi; Yoshinori Taji; Toshihiko Shimada; Yoshinori Noguchi
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Prediction of anastomotic leakage after anterior rectal resection.

Authors:  Shubang Cheng; Bolin He; Xueyi Zeng
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Development and Learner-Based Assessment of a Novel, Customized, 3D Printed Small Bowel Simulator for Hand-Sewn Anastomosis Training.

Authors:  Merieme Habti; Florence Bénard; Artur Arutiunian; Simon Bérubé; Dominic Cadoret; Léamarie Meloche-Dumas; Andrei Torres; Bill Kapralos; Frédéric Mercier; Adam Dubrowski; Erica Patocskai
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-20

9.  Colorectal anastomosis during cytoreductive radical surgery in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. Validation of a new technique (without stoma) to prevent anastomosis leakage in more than 1000 procedures.

Authors:  P Barrios; I Ramos; O Crusellas; D Sabia; S Mompart; M Martín-Baranera
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.405

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.