Literature DB >> 22377109

Serologic evidence of nipah virus infection in bats, Vietnam.

Futoshi Hasebe, Nguyen Thi Thu Thuy, Shingo Inoue, Fuxun Yu, Yoshihiro Kaku, Shumpei Watanabe, Hiroomi Akashi, Dang Tuan Dat, Le Thi Quynh Mai, Kouichi Morita.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22377109      PMCID: PMC3309638          DOI: 10.3201/eid1803.111121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Bats are potential reservoir for highly pathogenic viruses, such as Nipah virus (NiV) and Hendra virus, which can cross species barriers (). However, only limited surveillance has been conducted to assess risk for infection by these deadly emerging viruses. We conducted a study in Vietnam from 2007 to 2008 to assess the prevalence of these pathogens in bats. Different species of live bats were obtained from hunters or were captured in caves, pepper fields, and residential areas by using mist nets or harp traps (Technical Appendix Figure 1). A total of 451 serum samples were collected and subjected to IgG ELISA by using an Escherichia coli–derived recombinant nucleocapsid (N) protein of NiV (NiV-N-ELISA) (). Two Leschenault’s rousette bats (Rousettus leschenaulti) were vaccinated with the same recombinant N protein to obtain positive serum specimens that contained antibodies against NiV-N. An optical density of 492 nm for negative control serum (1,000× dilution) was designated as 1:1,000 ELISA units. ELISA titers of sample serum specimens were obtained at a single dilution (1,000×) by using a standard curve of positive serum with high titers. A sample titer >3,000 was considered positive for IgG against NiV. Positive results were detected from only 2 fruit bat species, R. leschenaulti (31 bats [49.1%]) and Cynopterus sphinx (3 bats [2.8%]) (Table). Of the 34 samples positive by ELISA, only 22 (20 from the former and 2 from the latter bat species), which had enough volume left, were further analyzed by Western blot (WB) with E. coli–expressed recombinant N protein of NiV (Table; Technical Appendix Figure 2). Twenty of the 22 specimens were confirmed as positive by WB. ELISA-positive samples with high titers were also positive by WB for both bat species. However, only 1 sample from an R. leschenaulti bat was positive by WB that used a baculovirus-expressed recombinant N protein. Because of the different protein expression systems, the reactivity of bat antibody against NiV protein in WBs showed different patterns (Technical Appendix Figure 2). Neutralization tests (NTs) in which live NiVs (strain Ma-JMR-01–98) were used were performed at the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University. No specimens of C. sphinx bats were positive by NT; however, 2 specimens from R. leschenaulti bats, both positive with low titers, were confirmed to be positive by NT (50% cytopathic effect after NT, titers of 33.6 and 14.1). However, the latter specimen was negative by WB analysis.
Table

Results of serologic tests for Nipah virus on bats captured in Vietnam, 2007–2008*

Bat speciesNo. samplesNo. (%) ELISA+No. WB+/no. ELISA+No. micro-NT+/no. ELISA+†
Megachiroptera
Cynopterus sphinx 1093 (2.8)2/20/3
Rousettus leschenaulti 7431 (41.9)18/202‡/31
Total18334 (18.6)20/222/34
Microchiroptera
Chaerephon plicata 1300
Hipposideros armiger 10
Hipposideros cineraceus 30
Hipposideros larvatus 30
Hipposideros pomona 50
Hypsugo cadornae 250
Megaderma spasma 30
Miniopterus magnater 10
Scotophilus kuhi 450
Unidentified520
Total2680

*+, positive; WB, Western blot; NT, neutralization test. Blank cells indicate that test was not done.
†Micro-NT was done only on specimens positive for Nipah virus by ELISA.
‡One of the NT-positive samples was negative by WB analysis.

*+, positive; WB, Western blot; NT, neutralization test. Blank cells indicate that test was not done.
†Micro-NT was done only on specimens positive for Nipah virus by ELISA.
‡One of the NT-positive samples was negative by WB analysis. Seroepidemiologic studies in other countries have indicated that Pteropus spp. bats (fruit-eating bats) are the main reservoirs for NiV (–). Pteropid bats are usually found only in southern Vietnam. We could not obtain these bats for our study. However, a relatively high prevalence (49.1%) of henipavirus antibody was found in R. leschenaulti specimens from Hoa Binh Province. Rousettus spp. bats are the only megabats that use echolocation. These bats hang together on cave ceilings in a tightly packed manner and in groups composed of bats of both sexes and of different ages. They roost in large colonies and fly vast distances to find fruit (). This behavior might be related to their high rate of seropositivity for viral infections. In southern China, bats of the same species showed a high prevalence of henipavirus antibody (). R. leschenaulti bats are distributed from central to northern Vietnam and southern China. C. sphinx bats are common all over Vietnam, and their habitat overlaps with that of pteropid bats in southern Vietnam. Previous studies showed that IgG ELISA results for NiV-positive flying foxes correlated well with NT results (,). However, in our study, discrepancies existed between NT results and NiV-N-ELISA and WB results. A reason for these differences could be that Nipah-like viruses are circulating among bats in Vietnam, producing antibodies that are cross-reactive by ELISA and WB, but poorly cross-reactive by NT. The cross-reactive antibodies were probably not directed against neutralizing epitopes. To date, no reports have been made of an increased number of febrile encephalitis cases among the residents in Hoa Binh and Dak Lak Provinces where seropositive bats were captured. The circulating viruses may lack the pathogenic potential of Hendra and Nipah viruses. A survey by questionnaire was conducted among residents of Dak Nong and Dak Lak Provinces, where NiV-N-ELISA–positive C. sphinx bats were captured, to determine the frequency of contact between humans and bats. Risk factors for infection were observed in this study, such as bat hunting and cooking and drinking bat blood. In such situations, persons have direct contact with bat body fluids and feces and might be bitten during bat hunting. Thus, long-term systematic surveillance of bats is needed to determine the ecologic relationship between bats, humans, other animals, and the environment.

Technical Appendix

Bat study sites in Vietnam, 2007–2008.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Bats: important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses.

Authors:  Charles H Calisher; James E Childs; Hume E Field; Kathryn V Holmes; Tony Schountz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Serodiagnosis using recombinant nipah virus nucleocapsid protein expressed in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Fuxun Yu; Nor Shahidah Khairullah; Shingo Inoue; Vijayamalar Balasubramaniam; Stella Joan Berendam; Leok Kin Teh; Nik Shamsiah Wan Ibrahim; Sohayati Abdul Rahman; Sharifah Syed Hassan; Futoshi Hasebe; Mangalam Sinniah; Kouichi Morita
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Nipah virus in Lyle's flying foxes, Cambodia.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Reynes; Dorian Counor; Sivuth Ong; Caroline Faure; Vansay Seng; Sophie Molia; Joe Walston; Marie Claude Georges-Courbot; Vincent Deubel; Jean-Louis Sarthou
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Nipah virus encephalitis reemergence, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Vincent P Hsu; Mohammed Jahangir Hossain; Umesh D Parashar; Mohammed Monsur Ali; Thomas G Ksiazek; Ivan Kuzmin; Michael Niezgoda; Charles Rupprecht; Joseph Bresee; Robert F Breiman
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Nipah virus infection in bats (order Chiroptera) in peninsular Malaysia.

Authors:  J M Yob; H Field; A M Rashdi; C Morrissy; B van der Heide; P Rota; A bin Adzhar; J White; P Daniels; A Jamaluddin; T Ksiazek
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  Antibodies to Nipah or Nipah-like viruses in bats, China.

Authors:  Yan Li; Jianmin Wang; Andrew C Hickey; Yunzhi Zhang; Yuchun Li; Yi Wu; Huajun Zhang; Junfa Yuan; Zhenggang Han; Jennifer McEachern; Christopher C Broder; Lin-Fa Wang; Zhengli Shi
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Bat Nipah virus, Thailand.

Authors:  Supaporn Wacharapluesadee; Boonlert Lumlertdacha; Kalyanee Boongird; Sawai Wanghongsa; Lawan Chanhome; Pierre Rollin; Patrick Stockton; Charles E Rupprecht; Thomas G Ksiazek; Thiravat Hemachudha
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.883

  7 in total
  24 in total

Review 1.  Nipah virus matrix protein: expert hacker of cellular machines.

Authors:  Ruth E Watkinson; Benhur Lee
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Hendra virus and Nipah virus animal vaccines.

Authors:  Christopher C Broder; Dawn L Weir; Peter A Reid
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Henipavirus receptor usage and tropism.

Authors:  Olivier Pernet; Yao E Wang; Benhur Lee
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 4.  Zoonotic Potential of Emerging Paramyxoviruses: Knowns and Unknowns.

Authors:  Patricia A Thibault; Ruth E Watkinson; Andres Moreira-Soto; Jan F Drexler; Benhur Lee
Journal:  Adv Virus Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 9.937

5.  Nipah Virus Matrix Protein Influences Fusogenicity and Is Essential for Particle Infectivity and Stability.

Authors:  Erik Dietzel; Larissa Kolesnikova; Bevan Sawatsky; Anja Heiner; Michael Weis; Gary P Kobinger; Stephan Becker; Veronika von Messling; Andrea Maisner
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Animal models of disease shed light on Nipah virus pathogenesis and transmission.

Authors:  Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  Duration of Maternal Antibodies against Canine Distemper Virus and Hendra Virus in Pteropid Bats.

Authors:  Jonathan H Epstein; Michelle L Baker; Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio; Deborah Middleton; Jennifer A Barr; Edward Dubovi; Victoria Boyd; Brian Pope; Shawn Todd; Gary Crameri; Allyson Walsh; Katey Pelican; Mark D Fielder; Angela J Davies; Lin-Fa Wang; Peter Daszak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Two decades of one health surveillance of Nipah virus in Thailand.

Authors:  Supaporn Wacharapluesadee; Siriporn Ghai; Prateep Duengkae; Pattarapol Manee-Orn; Weerapong Thanapongtharm; Abhinbhen W Saraya; Sangchai Yingsakmongkon; Yutthana Joyjinda; Sanipa Suradhat; Weenassarin Ampoot; Bundit Nuansrichay; Thongchai Kaewpom; Rachod Tantilertcharoen; Apaporn Rodpan; Kachen Wongsathapornchai; Teerada Ponpinit; Rome Buathong; Saowalak Bunprakob; Sudarat Damrongwatanapokin; Chanida Ruchiseesarod; Sininat Petcharat; Wantanee Kalpravidh; Kevin J Olival; Martha M Stokes; Thiravat Hemachudha
Journal:  One Health Outlook       Date:  2021-07-05

9.  Molecular detection of a novel paramyxovirus in fruit bats from Indonesia.

Authors:  Michihito Sasaki; Agus Setiyono; Ekowati Handharyani; Ibenu Rahmadani; Siswatiana Taha; Sri Adiani; Mawar Subangkit; Hirofumi Sawa; Ichiro Nakamura; Takashi Kimura
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.099

10.  The distribution of henipaviruses in Southeast Asia and Australasia: is Wallace's line a barrier to Nipah virus?

Authors:  Andrew C Breed; Joanne Meers; Indrawati Sendow; Katharine N Bossart; Jennifer A Barr; Ina Smith; Supaporn Wacharapluesadee; Linfa Wang; Hume E Field
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.