Oskar Krantz1. 1. Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Sweden. oskar.krantz@mah.se
Abstract
PURPOSE: This theoretical article proposes a framework of understanding a user perspective of assistive devices utilisation in everyday life. METHOD: Utilising the MPT model (Matching Person and Technology) and the ValMO model (Values and Meaning in Human Occupations), a framework of understanding is proposed. RESULTS: Main components are person, assistive device, and activity, connected by the person's expectations and experiences concerning the doability/doworthiness (possible to do/worth doing) of an activity, and the usability/useworthiness (possible to use/worth using) of an assistive device. Expectations may differ based on not only earlier experiences (habitus), but also situational and environmental variations, and result in differing experiences. In general, the purpose of an assistive device is to increase a person's repertoire of doable activities. For a person, this can be a function of the evaluation of possible gains, in terms of correlation between investments (in terms of time and energy), and the (expected) result of the activity. CONCLUSIONS: The only person able to estimate the useworthiness/usability of a device and the doworthiness/doability of an activity is the user her/himself, assessing the degree at which a specific assistive device enhances the value of an activity, in turn affecting the habitus of the (presumptive) user. [Box: see text].
PURPOSE: This theoretical article proposes a framework of understanding a user perspective of assistive devices utilisation in everyday life. METHOD: Utilising the MPT model (Matching Person and Technology) and the ValMO model (Values and Meaning in Human Occupations), a framework of understanding is proposed. RESULTS: Main components are person, assistive device, and activity, connected by the person's expectations and experiences concerning the doability/doworthiness (possible to do/worth doing) of an activity, and the usability/useworthiness (possible to use/worth using) of an assistive device. Expectations may differ based on not only earlier experiences (habitus), but also situational and environmental variations, and result in differing experiences. In general, the purpose of an assistive device is to increase a person's repertoire of doable activities. For a person, this can be a function of the evaluation of possible gains, in terms of correlation between investments (in terms of time and energy), and the (expected) result of the activity. CONCLUSIONS: The only person able to estimate the useworthiness/usability of a device and the doworthiness/doability of an activity is the user her/himself, assessing the degree at which a specific assistive device enhances the value of an activity, in turn affecting the habitus of the (presumptive) user. [Box: see text].
Authors: Alessandra Pedrocchi; Simona Ferrante; Emilia Ambrosini; Marta Gandolla; Claudia Casellato; Thomas Schauer; Christian Klauer; Javier Pascual; Carmen Vidaurre; Margit Gföhler; Werner Reichenfelser; Jakob Karner; Silvestro Micera; Andrea Crema; Franco Molteni; Mauro Rossini; Giovanna Palumbo; Eleonora Guanziroli; Andreas Jedlitschka; Marco Hack; Maria Bulgheroni; Enrico d'Amico; Peter Schenk; Sven Zwicker; Alexander Duschau-Wicke; Justinas Miseikis; Lina Graber; Giancarlo Ferrigno Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 4.262