Literature DB >> 22375631

Sexual self-disclosure among university women.

E S Herold1, L Way.   

Abstract

Although there has been considerable research about self-disclosure, there has been a lack of research regarding disclosure of sexual topics. In order to increase our understanding of sexual self-disclosure (SSD), a scale was developed to measure SSD, and 10 variables were tested as predictors of SSD. The subjects were 203 unmarried university females aged 18-22. SSD was measured separately for each of the target groups of mother, father, close friend, and dating partner. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed separately for virgin and non-virgin subjects. The one variable which was significant for each of the target groups in each of the analyses was sexual comfort level of the target person. The variables of sex guilt and target person's sexual attitudes were significant for disclosure to each of the target groups among the nonvirgin subjects but to only some of the target groups among the virgin subjects. The remaining seven predictor variables were significant for at least one of the target groups. In the multiple regression models, the proportion of variance explained ranged from 28% to 58%. The results indicate the value of controlling for both target group and virginity status when analyzing the relationship of predictor variables to SSD.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 22375631     DOI: 10.1080/00224498809551394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  6 in total

1.  Partner Naming and Forgetting: Recall of Network Members.

Authors:  David C Bell; Benedetta Belli-McQueen; Ali Haider
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2007-05

2.  Adolescent sexual health communication and condom use: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Widman; Seth M Noar; Sophia Choukas-Bradley; Diane B Francis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Dimensions of couples' sexual communication, relationship satisfaction, and sexual satisfaction: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Allen B Mallory
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2021-12-30

4.  The effect of question preface on response rates to a telephone survey of sexual experience.

Authors:  M W Wiederman; D L Weis; E R Allgeier
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1994-04

5.  Effects of a Sexual Health Interview among Arab American Women: An Experimental Disclosure Study.

Authors:  Hannah J Holmes; Jolin B Yamin; Shoshana Krohner; Lisa J Rapport; Emily R Grekin; Howard Schubiner; Mark A Lumley
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-03-31

6.  Psychosexual Correlates of Sexual Double Standard Endorsement in Adolescent Sexuality.

Authors:  Peggy M J Emmerink; Ine Vanwesenbeeck; Regina J J M van den Eijnden; Tom F M Ter Bogt
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2015-09-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.