| Literature DB >> 22375306 |
Kathy Willowson1, Dale Bailey, Geoff Schembri, Clive Baldock.
Abstract
We have previously reported on a method for reconstructing quantitative data from 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images based on corrections derived from X-ray computed tomography, producing accurate results in both experimental and clinical studies. This has been extended for use with the radionuclide ²⁰¹Tl. Accuracy was evaluated with experimental phantom studies, including corrections for partial volume effects where necessary. The quantitative technique was used to derive standardized uptake values (SUVs) for ²⁰¹Tl evaluation of brain tumours. A preliminary study was performed on 26 patients using ²⁰¹Tl SPECT scans to assess residual tumor after surgery and then to monitor response to treatment, with a follow-up time of 18 months. Measures of SUVmax were made following quantitative processing of the data and using a threshold grown volume of interest around the tumour. Phantom studies resulted in the calculation of concentration values consistently within 4% of true values. No continuous relation was found between SUVmax (post-resection) and patient survival. Choosing an SUVmax cut-off of 1.5 demonstrated a difference in survival between the 2 groups of patients after surgery. Patients with an SUVmax<1.5 had a 70% survival rate over the first 10 months, compared with a 47% survival rate for those with SUVmax>1.5. This difference did not achieve significance, most likely due to the small study numbers. By 18 months follow-up this difference had reduced, with corresponding survival rates of 40% and 27%, respectively. Although this study involves only a small cohort, it has succeeded in demonstrating the possibility of an SUV measure for SPECT to help monitor response to treatment of brain tumours and predict survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22375306 PMCID: PMC3335331 DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Imaging ISSN: 1470-7330 Impact factor: 3.909
Experimental measures for 201Tl of the slope of the scatter function (s), the scatter fraction parameters (A, B and β) that describe the build-up function, the measured camera sensitivity factor, and the reconstructed system spatial resolution to be used in conjunction with the measured recovery coefficients for partial volume corrections
| Experimental parameter | Measured value |
|---|---|
| Scatter function | 0.28 ± 0.2 |
| Scatter fraction | |
| | 2.89 ± 0.31 |
| | 1.88 ± 0.31 |
| | 0.25 ± 0.05 |
| Sensitivity (counts s−1 MBq−1) | 126.7 ± 1.3 |
| Spatial resolution (mm) | 19.8 ± 0.2 |
Figure 1The measured scatter fraction values for increasing thickness of scattering medium when imaging 201Tl, modelled with the build-up function (Eq. (2)).
Figure 2Recovery coefficient values for each object size against the diameter as a fraction of the system spatial resolution (FWHM).
Quantitative validation using the RSD anthropomorphic striatal brain phantom
| Region | True kBq ml−1 | Measured kBq ml−1 | Recovery coefficient | Calculated kBq ml−1 | Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 40.2 | 41.1 | – | 41.1 | +2.2 |
| Cold lesion | 0 | 26.5 | – | – | – |
| Lesion 1 | 109 | 52.6 | 0.5 | 105.2 | –3.5 |
| Lesion 2 | 164 | 79.2 | 0.5 | 158.4 | –3.4 |
| Lesion 3 | 218 | 110.1 | 0.5 | 220.0 | +0.9 |
The true activity concentrations are compared with calculated mean concentrations both with and without corrections for partial volume effects, for the background and lesions of varying activity ratios. The differences between the true and calculated concentrations, when all corrections are taken into account, are displayed as a percentage of the true values.
Figure 3Example of a reconstructed quantitative 201Tl SPECT with a Butterworth filter, co-registered to the radiotherapy treatment planning CT (left), and the corresponding threshold grown ROI (right).
Figure 4Relationship between (a) baseline SUVmax and survival, (b) baseline SUVmax and measured tumour-to-background ratio, and (c) tumour-to-background ratio and survival.
Relative changes in tumour-to-background ratios (T:B) and SUVmax values between initial and delayed imaging as measured on 8 patient studies
| Patient | Δ | ΔSUVmax (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | −25.0 | −2.9 |
| 2 | −28.6 | 31.0 |
| 3 | −5.9 | 33.2 |
| 4 | −17.9 | 16.9 |
| 5 | −13.3 | 0.0 |
| 6 | −20.0 | 0.0 |
| 7 | −8.7 | 17.9 |
| 8 | 0.0 | 61.8 |
| Mean ± SD | −14.9 ± 9.8 | 19.7 ± 22.0 |
Figure 5Fraction of surviving patients over initial 18 months post-SPECT categorized by the arbitrary cut-off of baseline SUVmax equal to 1.5.