| Literature DB >> 22375233 |
Ho-Heng Tian1, Abdul-Rashid Aziz, Weileen Png, Mohamed Faizul Wahid, Donald Yeo, Ai-Li Constance Png.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Our study aimed to profile the effect of fasting during the Ramadan month on cognitive function in a group of healthy Muslim athletes.Entities:
Keywords: Cognition; Memory; Psychomotor Function; Ramadan Fasting
Year: 2011 PMID: 22375233 PMCID: PMC3289210 DOI: 10.5812/asjsm.34753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Sports Med ISSN: 2008-000X
Fig. 1Study design
Performance measures for CogState tests and change scores (negative values indicate performance decline)
| CogState test | Cognition domain | Performance measure | Change score | Change score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychomotor function (processing speed) | Speed | 0.124 | − 0.028 (0.014) | 0.138 | − 0.014 (0.02) | |
| Vigilance (visual attention) | Speed | 0.044 | 0.028 (0.017) | − 0.006 (0.015) | − 0.022 (0.02) | |
| Visual learning & memory | Accuracy | − 0.004 (0.024) | − 0.071 (0.038) | 0.085 | 0.018 (0.033) | |
| Executive function (working memory) | Accuracy | − 0.062 (0.039) | − 0.026 (0.043) | 0.006 (0.003) | 0.093 (0.04) | |
| Verbal learning & memory | Number of correct responses | 0.444 (0.544) | −1.557 | 2.28 | 0.28 (0.522) | |
Mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses;
Arcsine transformation of the square root of the proportion of correct responses;
Total number of correct responses made in remembering the list after a delay;
Significant change in performance between fasting and non-fasting
Significant change in performance between 0900h and 1600h
Effect of Time-of-Day (TOD) and Fasting on CogState task performance
| Cogstate task | Time-of-day effect | Fasting effect | Fasting & time-of-day interaction effect | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.19 | 0.001 | 6.95 | 0.01 | 17.51 | <0.001 | |
| 1.26 | 0.27 | 9.40 | 0.004 | 0.46 | 0.5 | |
| 4.59 | 0.04 | 2.79 | 0.10 | 2.19 | 0.15 | |
| 4.03 | 0.05 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 2.27 | 0.14 | |
| 12.24 | 0.001 | 5.23 | 0.03 | 5.26 | 0.03 | |
Significant time-of-day effect
Significant fasting effect
Better performance at 0900h during fasting
Poorer performance at 1600h during fasting
Fig. 2aDetection task during fasting and non-fasting, 0900hrs vs 1600hrs. Lower scores indicate better performance.
Fig. 2bIdentification task during fasting and non-fasting, 0900hrs vs 1600hrs. Lower scores indicate better performance.
Fig. 2cInternational shopping list recall task during fasting and non-fasting, 0900hrs vs 1600hrs. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Physiological parameters and sleep volume
| Parameters | Time | Non – fasting | Fasting | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0900h | 69.8 (16.8) | 69.3 (16.3) | 0.6 | |
| 1600h | 69.8 (17.0) | 68.4 (16.1) | <0.001 | |
| 0900h | 5.8 (1.2) | 5.4 (0.6) | 0.3 | |
| 1600h | 5.4 (0.9) | 4.6 (0.3) | 0.001 | |
| 0900h | 36.6 (0.2) | 36.5 (0.3) | 0.07 | |
| 1600h | 36.7 (0.3) | 36.6 (0.2) | 0.05 | |
| 0900h | 1.020 (0.009) | 1.021 (0.009) | 0.8 | |
| 1600h | 1.021 (0.007) | 1.023 (0.004) | 0.3 | |
| 7.0 (1.7) | 5.3 (1.8) | 0.005 | ||
| 0.3 (0.4) | 3.0 (2.1) | 0.001 |