Literature DB >> 22375228

Sudden cardiac death in young athletes.

Dilip R Patel.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Athletes; Sudden Cardiac Arrest; Sudden Cardiac Death

Year:  2011        PMID: 22375228      PMCID: PMC3289198          DOI: 10.5812/asjsm.34778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Sports Med        ISSN: 2008-000X


× No keyword cloud information.
The article by Halabchi et al. provides a comprehensive, thoughtful and balanced analysis of the literature on sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young athletes [. The article is unique in providing a special perspective for Asia as contrasted with those in Europe and the United States. This aspect is extremely important to recognize for the management of young athletes in different parts of the world. In the United States, the history and physical examination (H&P) has been the standard of cardiovascular screening for competitive athletes, although several studies have questioned the efficacy of the screening H&P alone in identifying athletes at risk for cardiovascular adverse events [. The H&P has come under scrutiny for having low sensitivity for identifying athletes with cardiovascular risk factors. Several studies have reported data substantiating the higher efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) in identifying athletes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), channelopathies, and other clinically silent cardiovascular diseases that increase the risk for SCD in young athletes [. The Italian experience using the ECG as part of screening athletes is cited most frequently as the basis for including ECG as a screening tool [. One argument against that study is that it is an observational study and not a prospective study with a control population [. At present there is no worldwide consensus on the added value of including ECG as a screening tool for all young athletes. In the United States the American Heart Association report provides the general framework for cardiovascular screening [. Large prospective studies are needed to evaluate the value of screening ECGs in the US population. 2-D echocardiogram (ECHO) is most useful for the diagnosis of structural heart disease [. Adding an ECHO to a cardiovascular screening program increases the likelihood of identifying structural abnormalities of the heart. The added cost of screening and the scarcity of resources, equipment, and personnel are significant barriers to recommend routine use of ECHO for screening. An ECHO can be considered a good confirmatory test after abnormal findings on H&P or ECG. There have been significant advances in the identification of genetic causes for cardiovascular diseases, leading to the question of present or future methods involving identification of genetic risk factors for cardiovascular disease using genetic testing as a screening tool [. Exercise stress testing is of limited value as a screening tool but has a role in risk stratification[. Exercise stress testing has been recommended in athletes older than 35. This is also part of the extended Italian recommendation for athletes older than 35[. Maximal exercise testing is an integral component to unmask arrhythmia in arrythmogenic ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), familial catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, and long QT syndrome. Frequent ventricular extrasystoles during exercise indicate underlying cardiac disease [. Several other tests are available for identification of certain specific conditions [. These include Holter monitoring (quantification of extrasystoles and identification of tachy-and bradyarrythmias), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan (ARVC, HCM, and myocarditis), tissue Doppler (ARVC), sodium channel blocker challenge (Brugada syndrome), and adenosine challenge for pre-excitation (familial risk of WPW syndrome and supraventricular tachycardia). These tests are not appropriate for mass screening due to low yield and also due to the need for expertise to successfully obtain and interpret the results. They become important after screening has raised concerns for specific problems. Also as shown by Hibachi et al [, there are a number of regional considerations in terms of the size of the young athlete populations, epidemiology of sudden cardiac death, access to technology, and economic feasibility. A world wide collaborative effort is needed to further delineate various disparate considerations pertaining to SCD in young athletes so that a more uniform, cohesive and regionally appropriate screening and prevent‘ion strategy can evolve. Identification of young athletes at risk for an adverse cardiovascular event during sport participation is a challenging task [. Even in the best of circumstances, outcome of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) on the field remains poor; therefore, prevention is critical. Cardiovascular screening of young athletes is based on ascertaining specific history and a thorough physical examination. Although inclusion of an ECG in screening asymptomatic athletes has been shown to increase the likelihood of identifying athletes at risk, considerable logistical and economic challenges remain, including using ECG as a screening tool. Even the most ideal screening strategy may not identify all athletes at risk for SCA on the field, and unfortunately SCD may be the first clinical manifestation of some cardiac conditions [.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular pre-participation screening of young competitive athletes for prevention of sudden death: proposal for a common European protocol. Consensus Statement of the Study Group of Sport Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology and the Working Group of Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Domenico Corrado; Antonio Pelliccia; Hans Halvor Bjørnstad; Luc Vanhees; Alessandro Biffi; Mats Borjesson; Nicole Panhuyzen-Goedkoop; Asterios Deligiannis; Erik Solberg; Dorian Dugmore; Klaus P Mellwig; Deodato Assanelli; Pietro Delise; Frank van-Buuren; Aris Anastasakis; Hein Heidbuchel; Ellen Hoffmann; Robert Fagard; Silvia G Priori; Cristina Basso; Eloisa Arbustini; Carina Blomstrom-Lundqvist; William J McKenna; Gaetano Thiene
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Recommendations and considerations related to preparticipation screening for cardiovascular abnormalities in competitive athletes: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors:  Barry J Maron; Paul D Thompson; Michael J Ackerman; Gary Balady; Stuart Berger; David Cohen; Robert Dimeff; Pamela S Douglas; David W Glover; Adolph M Hutter; Michael D Krauss; Martin S Maron; Matthew J Mitten; William O Roberts; James C Puffer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Electrocardiograms should be included in preparticipation screening of athletes.

Authors:  Robert J Myerburg; Victoria L Vetter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Appropriate interpretation of the athlete's electrocardiogram saves lives as well as money.

Authors:  Domenico Corrado; William J McKenna
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Sudden unexplained death: heritability and diagnostic yield of cardiological and genetic examination in surviving relatives.

Authors:  Hanno L Tan; Nynke Hofman; Irene M van Langen; Allard C van der Wal; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Trends in sudden cardiovascular death in young competitive athletes after implementation of a preparticipation screening program.

Authors:  Domenico Corrado; Cristina Basso; Andrea Pavei; Pierantonio Michieli; Maurizio Schiavon; Gaetano Thiene
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Sudden cardiac death in athletes: the Lausanne Recommendations.

Authors:  Karin Bille; David Figueiras; Patrick Schamasch; Lukas Kappenberger; Joel I Brenner; Folkert J Meijboom; Erik J Meijboom
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

8.  Recommendations for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiogram in the athlete.

Authors:  Domenico Corrado; Antonio Pelliccia; Hein Heidbuchel; Sanjay Sharma; Mark Link; Cristina Basso; Alessandro Biffi; Gianfranco Buja; Pietro Delise; Ihor Gussac; Aris Anastasakis; Mats Borjesson; Hans Halvor Bjørnstad; François Carrè; Asterios Deligiannis; Dorian Dugmore; Robert Fagard; Jan Hoogsteen; Klaus P Mellwig; Nicole Panhuyzen-Goedkoop; Erik Solberg; Luc Vanhees; Jonathan Drezner; N A Mark Estes; Sabino Iliceto; Barry J Maron; Roberto Peidro; Peter J Schwartz; Ricardo Stein; Gaetano Thiene; Paolo Zeppilli; William J McKenna
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  Advances in cardiac imaging: the role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in identifying athletes at risk.

Authors:  N H Prakken; B K Velthuis; M J Cramer; A Mosterd
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Prevalence of abnormal electrocardiograms in a large, unselected population undergoing pre-participation cardiovascular screening.

Authors:  Antonio Pelliccia; Franco Culasso; Fernando M Di Paolo; Domenico Accettura; Rocco Cantore; Walter Castagna; Alberto Ciacciarelli; Gioberto Costini; Biagio Cuffari; Enrico Drago; Vittorio Federici; Carlo Gabriele Gribaudo; Giancarlo Iacovelli; Luigi Landolfi; Giuseppe Menichetti; Umberto Olla Atzeni; Attilio Parisi; Angelo R Pizzi; Michele Rosa; Fabio Santelli; Franco Santilio; Alberto Vagnini; Maurizio Casasco; Luigi Di Luigi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.