| Literature DB >> 22375177 |
Murat Cakir1, Suleyman Caner Karahan, Ahmet Mentese, Elif Sag, Umit Cobanoglu, Tugcin Bora Polat, Erol Erduran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) levels have been shown to correlate with the severity of liver failure in adults. However, the role of IMA levels has not been evaluated in children with chronic liver disease (CLD). We analyzed the clinical significance of IMA levels in children with CLD.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Chronic liver disease; Ischemia modified albumin
Year: 2012 PMID: 22375177 PMCID: PMC3286745 DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.1.92
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut Liver ISSN: 1976-2283 Impact factor: 4.519
Demographic, Clinical, and Laboratory Findings in Patients with CLD and in the Control Group
Data are presented as mean±SD (range) or number (%).
CLD, chronic liver disease; PELD, pediatric end-stage liver disease; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TAS, total antioxidant status; TOS, total oxidant status; OSI, oxidative stress index; N/A: non available.
*,†p=0.039; ‡,§p=0.013.
The Serum IMA Levels and IMARs in Children with CLD and in the Control Group
CLD, chronic liver disease; IMA, ischemia modified albumin; ABSU, absorbance unit; SD, standard deviation; IMAR, ischemia modified albumin ratio.
The Correlation of IMARs with the Laboratory Findings
IMAR, ischemia modified albumin ratio; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; INR, international normalized ratio; TAS, total antioxidant status; TOS, total oxidant status; OSI, oxidative stress index; r, correlation coefficient.
Fig. 1The correlation of serum ischemia modified albumin ratios (IMARs) with the pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score (p=0.03, r=0.503).
Fig. 2The receiver operation curve of serum ischemia modified albumin ratio (IMAR) to examine its predictive use for assessing severe fibrosis (area under the receiver operation curve [AUROC], 0.78; p=0.006; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.95; best cutoff value, 0.140).
Fig. 3The receiver operation curve of serum ischemia modified albumin ratio (IMAR) to examine its predictive use for assessing the need for liver transplantation and/or mortality (area under the receiver operation curve [AUROC], 0.82; p=0.013; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.04; best cutoff value, 0.156).
Fig. 4The Kaplan-Meier analysis of outcomes based on a cutoff value of 0.156. Morbidity and/or mortality were significantly different between the children with chronic liver disease and the control group (50% vs 4.3%, p=0.005).