OBJECTIVE: England's National Chlamydia Screening Programme provides opportunistic testing for all 15-24-year-olds in healthcare and non-healthcare settings. The authors undertook an evaluation of a population service-based postal chlamydia screening and treatment service, with registration and access to the service via the internet, in order to target screening interventions more effectively in future. METHODS: Individuals aged between 18 and 24 years, within the North East Essex Primary Care Trust, were identified for chlamydia screening by the service between 1 December 2008 and 31 January 2009. Associations between test uptake and positivity, and individuals' personal characteristics, were examined. The efficacy of partner notification was estimated, and the costs of screening were compared with the national average. RESULTS: Uptake of chlamydia screening was 11.5%, with lower response rates among men, individuals older than 20 years and those living in more deprived areas. The chlamydia positivity was 4.4% and higher in those reporting multiple sexual partners, individuals older than 20 years and those living in more deprived areas. The proportion of partners notified per index case was 0.17. The service contributed to 3431 of the overall 11,209 annual chlamydia screens of the Primary Care Trust in 2008-2009, at a cost of £ 78 per screening test completed and £ 1764 per case detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation shows that this service model can contribute substantially to the overall coverage of chlamydia screening tests. However, the costs of service provision per case detected and treated, using this model, were high compared to the National Chlamydia Screening Programme.
OBJECTIVE: England's National Chlamydia Screening Programme provides opportunistic testing for all 15-24-year-olds in healthcare and non-healthcare settings. The authors undertook an evaluation of a population service-based postal chlamydia screening and treatment service, with registration and access to the service via the internet, in order to target screening interventions more effectively in future. METHODS: Individuals aged between 18 and 24 years, within the North East Essex Primary Care Trust, were identified for chlamydia screening by the service between 1 December 2008 and 31 January 2009. Associations between test uptake and positivity, and individuals' personal characteristics, were examined. The efficacy of partner notification was estimated, and the costs of screening were compared with the national average. RESULTS: Uptake of chlamydia screening was 11.5%, with lower response rates among men, individuals older than 20 years and those living in more deprived areas. The chlamydia positivity was 4.4% and higher in those reporting multiple sexual partners, individuals older than 20 years and those living in more deprived areas. The proportion of partners notified per index case was 0.17. The service contributed to 3431 of the overall 11,209 annual chlamydia screens of the Primary Care Trust in 2008-2009, at a cost of £ 78 per screening test completed and £ 1764 per case detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation shows that this service model can contribute substantially to the overall coverage of chlamydia screening tests. However, the costs of service provision per case detected and treated, using this model, were high compared to the National Chlamydia Screening Programme.
Authors: Kevin A T M Theunissen; Arjan E R Bos; Christian J P A Hoebe; Gerjo Kok; Stan Vluggen; Rik Crutzen; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Shelagh M Redmond; Karin Alexander-Kisslig; Sarah C Woodhall; Ingrid V F van den Broek; Jan van Bergen; Helen Ward; Anneli Uusküla; Björn Herrmann; Berit Andersen; Hannelore M Götz; Otilia Sfetcu; Nicola Low Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anneli Uusküla; Ellie J Ricketts; Claire Rugman; Ruth R Kalda; Hans Fredlund; Johan Hedlund; Brigitte Dunais; Pia P Touboul; Cliodna McNulty Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kevin Theunissen; Christian Hoebe; Gerjo Kok; Rik Crutzen; Chakib Kara-Zaïtri; Nanne de Vries; Jan van Bergen; Robert Hamilton; Marianne van der Sande; Nicole Dukers-Muijrers Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kevin A T M Theunissen; Christian J P A Hoebe; Rik Crutzen; Chakib Kara-Zaïtri; Nanne K de Vries; Jan E A M van Bergen; Marianne A B van der Sande; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Catherine R H Aicken; Sebastian S Fuller; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Claudia S Estcourt; Voula Gkatzidou; Pippa Oakeshott; Kate Hone; S Tariq Sadiq; Pam Sonnenberg; Maryam Shahmanesh Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jo Gibbs; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Voula Gkatzidou; Kate Hone; Richard E Ashcroft; Emma M Harding-Esch; Catherine M Lowndes; S Tariq Sadiq; Pam Sonnenberg; Claudia S Estcourt Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 2.796