AIMS: Reentry accounts for most life-threatening arrhythmias, complicating myocardial infarction, and therapies that consistently prevent reentry from occurring are lacking. In this study, we compare antiarrhythmic effects of gene transfer of green fluorescent protein (GFP; sham), the skeletal muscle sodium channel (SkM1), the liver-specific connexin (Cx32), and SkM1/Cx32 in the subacute canine infarct. METHODS AND RESULTS: Immediately after ligation of the left anterior descending artery, viral constructs were implanted in the epicardial border zone (EBZ). Five to 7 days later, efficient restoration of impulse propagation (narrow QRS and local electrogram duration) occurred in SkM1, Cx32, and SkM1/Cx32 groups (P< 0.05 vs. GFP). Programmed electrical stimulation from the EBZ induced sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 15/22 GFP dogs vs. 2/12 SkM1, 6/14 Cx32, and 8/10 SkM1/Cx32 (P< 0.05 SkM1 vs. GFP). GFP, SkM1, and SkM1/Cx32 had predominantly polymorphic VT/VF, whereas in Cx32 dogs, monomorphic VT predominated (P< 0.05 for Cx32 vs. GFP). Tetrazolium red staining showed significantly larger infarcts in Cx32- vs. GFP-treated animals (P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Whereas SkM1 gene transfer reduces the incidence of inducible VT/VF, Cx32 therapy to improve gap junctional conductance results in larger infarct size, a different VT morphology, and no antiarrhythmic efficacy.
AIMS: Reentry accounts for most life-threatening arrhythmias, complicating myocardial infarction, and therapies that consistently prevent reentry from occurring are lacking. In this study, we compare antiarrhythmic effects of gene transfer of green fluorescent protein (GFP; sham), the skeletal muscle sodium channel (SkM1), the liver-specific connexin (Cx32), and SkM1/Cx32 in the subacute canineinfarct. METHODS AND RESULTS: Immediately after ligation of the left anterior descending artery, viral constructs were implanted in the epicardial border zone (EBZ). Five to 7 days later, efficient restoration of impulse propagation (narrow QRS and local electrogram duration) occurred in SkM1, Cx32, and SkM1/Cx32 groups (P< 0.05 vs. GFP). Programmed electrical stimulation from the EBZ induced sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 15/22 GFP dogs vs. 2/12 SkM1, 6/14 Cx32, and 8/10 SkM1/Cx32 (P< 0.05 SkM1 vs. GFP). GFP, SkM1, and SkM1/Cx32 had predominantly polymorphic VT/VF, whereas in Cx32 dogs, monomorphic VT predominated (P< 0.05 for Cx32 vs. GFP). Tetrazolium red staining showed significantly larger infarcts in Cx32- vs. GFP-treated animals (P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Whereas SkM1 gene transfer reduces the incidence of inducible VT/VF, Cx32 therapy to improve gap junctional conductance results in larger infarct size, a different VT morphology, and no antiarrhythmic efficacy.
Authors: M A Allessie; P A Boyden; A J Camm; A G Kléber; M J Lab; M J Legato; M R Rosen; P J Schwartz; P M Spooner; D R Van Wagoner ; A L Waldo Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-02-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: James K Hennan; Robert E Swillo; Gwen A Morgan; James C Keith; Robert G Schaub; Robert P Smith; Hal S Feldman; Ketil Haugan; Joel Kantrowitz; Phil J Wang; Aqel Abu-Qare; John Butera; Bjarne D Larsen; David L Crandall Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2005-12-12 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Ruben Coronel; David H Lau; Eugene A Sosunov; Michiel J Janse; Peter Danilo; Evgeny P Anyukhovsky; Francien J G Wilms-Schopman; Tobias Opthof; Iryna N Shlapakova; Nazira Ozgen; Kevin Prestia; Yelena Kryukova; Ira S Cohen; Richard B Robinson; Michael R Rosen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-04-10 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Lene N Axelsen; Martin Stahlhut; Shabaz Mohammed; Bjarne Due Larsen; Morten S Nielsen; Niels-Henrik Holstein-Rathlou; Søren Andersen; Ole N Jensen; James K Hennan; Anne Louise Kjølbye Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2006-05-05 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Rebecca Lewandowski; Kristina Procida; Ravi Vaidyanathan; Wanda Coombs; José Jalife; Morten S Nielsen; Steven M Taffet; Mario Delmar Journal: Circ Res Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Rob F Wiegerinck; Jacques M T de Bakker; Tobias Opthof; Nicolaas de Jonge; Hans Kirkels; Francien J G Wilms-Schopman; Ruben Coronel Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2009-01-12 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Lev Protas; Wen Dun; Zhiheng Jia; Jia Lu; Annalisa Bucchi; Sindhu Kumari; Ming Chen; Ira S Cohen; Michael R Rosen; Emilia Entcheva; Richard B Robinson Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2008-10-31 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Colleen E Clancy; Ye Chen-Izu; Donald M Bers; Luiz Belardinelli; Penelope A Boyden; Laszlo Csernoch; Sanda Despa; Bernard Fermini; Livia C Hool; Leighton Izu; Robert S Kass; W Jonathan Lederer; William E Louch; Christoph Maack; Alicia Matiazzi; Zhilin Qu; Sridharan Rajamani; Crystal M Rippinger; Ole M Sejersted; Brian O'Rourke; James N Weiss; András Varró; Antonio Zaza Journal: J Physiol Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Damiano Fassina; Caroline M Costa; Stefano Longobardi; Elias Karabelas; Gernot Plank; Sian E Harding; Steven A Niederer Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: David M Zhang; Rachita Navara; Tiankai Yin; Jeffrey Szymanski; Uri Goldsztejn; Camryn Kenkel; Adam Lang; Cedric Mpoy; Catherine E Lipovsky; Yun Qiao; Stephanie Hicks; Gang Li; Kaitlin M S Moore; Carmen Bergom; Buck E Rogers; Clifford G Robinson; Phillip S Cuculich; Julie K Schwarz; Stacey L Rentschler Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 14.919