Literature DB >> 22374880

da Vinci® single-site platform: anthropometrical, docking and suturing considerations for hysterectomy in the cadaver model.

Pedro F Escobar1, Jason Knight, Sanjay Rao, Lori Weinberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The paper describes specific technical requirements, limitations, anthropometrical, docking and suturing considerations on the performance of robotic hysterectomy using the da Vinci® Single-Site Platform in the cadaver model
METHODS: A data set was collected for each procedure including port placement, docking sequence, robotic arms placement and angles, robotic instrumentation, optimal ergonomics, operative time, and cadaver anthropometrical measurements. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine whether age, BMI or docking approach were correlated with docking difficulty and likelihood of successful procedure completion. Analysis of the data was performed using SPSS v19.0.0.
RESULTS: The planned surgical procedure was successfully completed with single-port robotics in 87.5% of cases. High BMI was correlated with difficulty docking the robot, correlation coefficient 0.98.
CONCLUSIONS: Further work is needed in the development and advancement of single-site robotic platforms, articulated instrumentation, and optics.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22374880     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  11 in total

1.  Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome.

Authors:  V Cela; L Freschi; G Simi; M Ruggiero; R Tana; N Pluchino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery systems in a suturing and knot tying task.

Authors:  Dan Eisenberg; Tamas J Vidovszky; James Lau; Bernadette Guiroy; Homero Rivas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Using the "Summa Set-up" in robotic assisted gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Thomas J Mendise; Edward M Ferris; Michele L McCarroll; Vivian E von Gruenigen
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-11-08

4.  A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.

Authors:  Natasha Gupta; D O Miranda Blevins; Jenny Holcombe; Robert Scott Furr
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2020-04-28

5.  Robotic surgery training in gynecologic fellowship programs in the United States.

Authors:  Soorena Fatehchehr; Ghazaleh Rostaminia; Michael O Gardner; Elisa Ramunno; Nora M Doyle
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 6.  Surgical management of early endometrial cancer: an update and proposal of a therapeutic algorithm.

Authors:  Francesca Falcone; Giancarlo Balbi; Luca Di Martino; Flavio Grauso; Maria Elena Salzillo; Enrico Michelino Messalli
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-07-26

7.  A Comparative Analysis of Robotic Single-Site Surgery and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery as Therapeutic Options for Stage IB1 Cervical Squamous Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinghai Gao; Jianhong Dang; Jing Chu; Xiaojun Liu; Jing Wang; Jiahao You; Zhijun Jin
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case-control study.

Authors:  So Hyun Ahn; Joo Hyun Park; Hye Rim Kim; SiHyun Cho; Myeongjee Lee; Seok Kyo Seo; Young Sik Choi; Byung Seok Lee
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Robotic Single-Site® Sacrocolpopexy: First Report and Technique Using the Single-Site® Wristed Needle Driver.

Authors:  Sa Ra Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Single-Incision Hysterectomy Outcomes With and Without Robotic Assistance.

Authors:  Yiming Zhang; Jaden R Kohn; Xiaoming Guan
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.